From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:33:27 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] STM32 DT changes for v4.11 #1 V2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170130053327.GB18943@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Alexandre, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:40:41PM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Olof, Arnd and Kevin, > > Please consider this second version of first round of STM32 DT updates for > v4.11: > > The following changes since commit 7ce7d89f48834cefece7804d38fc5d85382edf77: > > Linux 4.10-rc1 (2016-12-25 16:13:08 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/atorgue/stm32.git > tags/stm32-dt-for-v4.11-1-v2 > > for you to fetch changes up to a4e6964a78946bf3ce969d9fef5f201e0236f0ea: > > ARM: dts: stm32: enable RTC on stm32429i-eval (2017-01-20 14:59:58 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > STM32 DT updates for v4.11, round 1 Version 2. > > Highlights: > ---------- > > - ADD RTC support on STM32F429 MCU > - Enable RTC on STM32F469and STM32F429 boards > - ADD ADC support on STM32F429 MCU > - Enable ADC on STM32F429 Eval board > - Add I2S external clock > - Fix memory size for STM32F429 Disco > > Note: > ----- > First patch "clk: stm32f4: Update DT bindings documentation") > has already been merged in clock tree. Compare to version 1 > git merge has been used to take this patch. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Alexandre TORGUE (1): > Merge commit 'f8b5036361412a27c07a4ac9c3a4b80678cbd1e1' into > stm32-dt-for-v4.11 Hm, this is slightly odd, and I'm not entirely sure what goes on here. So please bear with me. First, Stephen: This commit (f8b5036361412a27c07a4ac9c3a4b80678cbd1e1) sits on top of a "random" commit from my view, 2aab7a2055a1705c9e30920d95a596226999eb21 ("clk: bcm: Fix 'maybe-uninitialized' warning in bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate()"). This isn't at an -rc*, and it's actually on a 4.9-rc base?! Anyway, it doesn't really matter to me, as long as we know for sure that it's on a stable base that won't move. Stephen, please confirm! Alexandre: Sorry for the hassle, with the above confirmed we should finally be OK to merge this. -Olof