From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:36:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 In-Reply-To: <20170131124223.GE11191@leverpostej> References: <20170130230818.9848-1-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170130230818.9848-2-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170131124223.GE11191@leverpostej> Message-ID: <20170131143635.GC22283@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:42:23PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:08:17PM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote: > > During a TLB invalidate sequence targeting the inner shareable domain, > > Falkor may prematurely complete the DSB before all loads and stores using > > the old translation are observed. Instruction fetches are not subject to > > the conditions of this erratum. If the original code sequence includes > > multiple TLB invalidate instructions followed by a single DSB, onle one of > > the TLB instructions needs to be repeated to work around this erratum. > > While the erratum only applies to cases in which the TLBI specifies the > > inner-shareable domain (*IS form of TLBI) and the DSB is ISH form or > > stronger (OSH, SYS), this changes applies the workaround overabundantly-- > > to local TLBI, DSB NSH sequences as well--for simplicity. > > > > Based on work by Shanker Donthineni > > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington > > This looks simple, self-contained, and correct, so FWIW: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > Catalin/Will, since we may see a documentation conflict against a timer > erratum, would you be hapyp to pick up [1] first, fixing up this patch > as necessary? > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/484594.html I replied over there, but I'd rather just take all the silicon-errata.txt changes because I don't see them as being dependent on the rest of the series. For this patch specifically, I can't merge it until you're happy with the other workaround, since they conflict. Will