linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v3 00/10] Provide the EL1 physical timer to the VM
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:31:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202123104.GJ27852@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485970990-13775-1-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu>

Hi Jintack,

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> The ARM architecture defines the EL1 physical timer and the virtual timer,
> and it is reasonable for an OS to expect to be able to access both.
> However, the current KVM implementation does not provide the EL1 physical
> timer to VMs but terminates VMs on access to the timer.
> 
> This patch series enables VMs to use the EL1 physical timer through
> trap-and-emulate.  The KVM host emulates each EL1 physical timer register
> access and sets up the background timer accordingly.  When the background
> timer expires, the KVM host injects EL1 physical timer interrupts to the
> VM.  Alternatively, it's also possible to allow VMs to access the EL1
> physical timer without trapping.  However, this requires somehow using the
> EL2 physical timer for the Linux host while running the VM instead of the
> EL1 physical timer.  Right now I just implemented trap-and-emulate because
> this was straightforward to do, and I leave it to future work to determine
> if transferring the EL1 physical timer state to the EL2 timer provides any
> performance benefit.
> 
> This feature will be useful for any OS that wishes to access the EL1
> physical timer. Nested virtualization is one of those use cases. A nested
> hypervisor running inside a VM would think it has full access to the
> hardware and naturally tries to use the EL1 physical timer as Linux would
> do. Other nested hypervisors may try to use the EL2 physical timer as Xen
> would do, but supporting the EL2 physical timer to the VM is out of scope
> of this patch series. This patch series will make it easy to add the EL2
> timer support in the future, though.
> 
> Note that Linux VMs booting in EL1 will be unaffected by this patch series
> and will continue to use only the virtual timer and this patch series will
> therefore not introduce any performance degredation as a result of
> trap-and-emulate.
> 
> v2 => v3:
>  - Rebase on kvmarm/queue
>  - Take kvm->lock to synchronize cntvoff across all vtimers
>  - Remove unnecessary function parameters
>  - Add comments

I just gave v3 a test run on my TC2 (32-bit platform) and my guest
quickly locks up trying to run cyclictest or when booting the machine it
stalls with RCU timeouts.

Could you have a look?

Thanks,
-Christoffer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-01 17:43 [RFC v3 00/10] Provide the EL1 physical timer to the VM Jintack Lim
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 01/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract virtual timer context into separate structure Jintack Lim
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 02/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Move cntvoff to each timer context Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:03   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 03/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Decouple kvm timer functions from virtual timer Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Add the EL1 physical timer context Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer interrupt level Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Set a background timer to the earliest timer expiration Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:30   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Set up a background timer for the physical timer emulation Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:30   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 09/10] KVM: arm64: Add the EL1 physical timer access handler Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:31   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 17:43 ` [RFC v3 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Emulate the EL1 phys timer registers Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 10:31   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-02 12:31 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-02-02 14:51   ` [RFC v3 00/10] Provide the EL1 physical timer to the VM Jintack Lim
2017-02-02 15:08     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-03 12:33     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-03 13:14       ` Jintack Lim
2017-02-03 13:34         ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202123104.GJ27852@cbox \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).