From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 23:39:58 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v31 09/12] arm64: kdump: provide /proc/vmcore file In-Reply-To: <20170202120850.GL31394@leverpostej> References: <20170201124218.5823-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20170201124630.6016-8-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20170201192121.GB30584@leverpostej> <20170202062408.GC13549@linaro.org> <20170202120320.GK31394@leverpostej> <20170202120850.GL31394@leverpostej> Message-ID: <20170202143957.GB3078@fireball> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:08:50PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:03:20PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:24:09PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 07:21:22PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:28PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > > > > +/* > > > > > + * reserve_elfcorehdr() - reserves memory for elf core header > > > > > + * > > > > > + * This function reserves elf core header given in "elfcorehdr=" kernel > > > > > + * command line parameter. This region contains all the information about > > > > > + * primary kernel's core image and is used by a dump capture kernel to > > > > > + * access the system memory on primary kernel. > > > > > + */ > > > Can you also fix the comment above reserve_elfcorehdr()? It refers to a > > non-existent kernel command line option. > > ... or rather, one that's handled by core code, not > reserve_elfcorehdr(). > > So more specifically, it would be nicer to have something like: > > /* > * reserve_elfcorehdr() - reserves memory for elf core header > * > * This function reserves the memory occupied by an elf core header > * described in the device tree. This region contains all the > * information about primary kernel's core image and is used by a dump > * capture kernel to access the system memory on primary kernel. > */ Perfect! Thanks a lot, -Takahiro AKASHI > Thanks, > Mark.