From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v31 04/12] arm64: mm: allow for unmapping part of kernel mapping
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:13:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203061317.GC29585@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170202145553.GA3238@fireball>
Mark,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:55:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:35:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:01:03PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:44:38AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 07:21:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:03:54PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:23PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > > > > > A new function, remove_pgd_mapping(), is added.
> > > > > > > It allows us to unmap a specific portion of kernel mapping later as far as
> > > > > > > the mapping is made using create_pgd_mapping() and unless we try to free
> > > > > > > a sub-set of memory range within a section mapping.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not keen on adding more page table modification code. It was painful
> > > > > > enough to ensure that those worked in all configurations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why can't we reuse create_pgd_mapping()? If we pass page_mappings_only,
> > > > > > and use an invalid prot (i.e. 0), what is the problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > As I did in v30?
> > > > > (though my implementation in v30 should be improved.)
> > > >
> > > > Something like that. I wasn't entirely sure why we needed to change
> > > > those functions so much, so I'm clearly missing something there. I'll go
> > > > have another look.
> > >
> > > I would be much easier if you see my new code.
> >
> > Sure. FWIW, I took a look, and I understand why those changes were
> > necessary.
> >
> > > > > If we don't need to free unused page tables, that would make things
> > > > > much simple. There are still some minor problems on the merge, but
> > > > > we can sort it out.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure I follow what you mean by 'on merge' here. Could you
> > > > elaborate?
> > >
> > > What I had in mind is some changes needed to handle "__prot(0)" properly
> > > in alloc_init_pxx(). For example, p[mu]d_set_huge() doesn't make
> > > a "zeroed" entry.
> >
> > I think that if we only allow ourselves to make PTEs invalid, we don't
> > have to handle that case. If we use page_mappings_only, we should only
> > check pgattr_change_is_safe() for the pte level, and the {pmd,pud,pgd}
> > entries shouldn't change.
> >
> > Is the below sufficient to allow that, or have I missed something?
>
> I think it will be OK, but will double-check tomorrow.
> However, is is acceptable that create_pgd_mapping( __prot(0) ) can
> only handle the cases of page-mapping-only?
> That would be fine to kdump, but in general?
My proposed code is attached below.
I think that the changes are quite trivial and it works even if
there is a section mapping as far as we refrain from reclaiming
unsed p[ug]d tables.
(Of course, we can't merely unmap a subset of a section mapping here.)
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
===8<===
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
index 2142c7726e76..945d84cd5df7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
#define PAGE_KERNEL_ROX __pgprot(_PAGE_DEFAULT | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_RDONLY)
#define PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC __pgprot(_PAGE_DEFAULT | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE)
#define PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC_CONT __pgprot(_PAGE_DEFAULT | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_CONT)
+#define PAGE_KERNEL_INVALID __pgprot(0)
#define PAGE_HYP __pgprot(_PAGE_DEFAULT | PTE_HYP | PTE_HYP_XN)
#define PAGE_HYP_EXEC __pgprot(_PAGE_DEFAULT | PTE_HYP | PTE_RDONLY)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 17243e43184e..7f96eabc99d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -140,7 +140,11 @@ static void alloc_init_pte(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
__prot = prot;
}
- set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, __prot));
+ if (pgprot_val(prot) & PTE_VALID)
+ set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, __prot));
+ else
+ pte_clear(null, null, pte);
+
pfn++;
/*
@@ -185,7 +189,8 @@ static void alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
/* try section mapping first */
if (((addr | next | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0 &&
- !page_mappings_only) {
+ !page_mappings_only &&
+ (pmd_none(old_pmd) || pmd_sect(old_pmd))) {
/*
* Set the contiguous bit for the subsequent group of
* PMDs if its size and alignment are appropriate.
@@ -256,7 +261,8 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
/*
* For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block
*/
- if (use_1G_block(addr, next, phys) && !page_mappings_only) {
+ if (use_1G_block(addr, next, phys) && !page_mappings_only &&
+ (pud_none(old_pud) || pud_sect(old_pud))) {
pud_set_huge(pud, phys, prot);
/*
@@ -334,12 +340,10 @@ static void __init create_mapping_noalloc(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
__create_pgd_mapping(init_mm.pgd, phys, virt, size, prot, NULL, false);
}
-void __init create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
- unsigned long virt, phys_addr_t size,
- pgprot_t prot, bool page_mappings_only)
+void create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
+ unsigned long virt, phys_addr_t size,
+ pgprot_t prot, bool page_mappings_only)
{
- BUG_ON(mm == &init_mm);
-
__create_pgd_mapping(mm->pgd, phys, virt, size, prot,
pgd_pgtable_alloc, page_mappings_only);
}
@@ -791,14 +795,26 @@ int __init arch_ioremap_pmd_supported(void)
int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
{
BUG_ON(phys & ~PUD_MASK);
- set_pud(pud, __pud(phys | PUD_TYPE_SECT | pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))));
+
+ if (pgprot_val(prot) & PTE_VALID)
+ set_pud(pud, __pud(phys | PUD_TYPE_SECT |
+ pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))));
+ else
+ pud_clear(pud);
+
return 1;
}
int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmd, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
{
BUG_ON(phys & ~PMD_MASK);
- set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(phys | PMD_TYPE_SECT | pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))));
+
+ if (pgprot_val(prot) & PTE_VALID)
+ set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(phys | PMD_TYPE_SECT |
+ pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))));
+ else
+ pmd_clear(pmd);
+
return 1;
}
===>8===
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-03 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-01 12:42 [PATCH v31 00/12] add kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:45 ` [PATCH v31 01/12] memblock: add memblock_cap_memory_range() AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 02/12] arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory-range AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 4:21 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 03/12] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 15:26 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 4:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 13:44 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 04/12] arm64: mm: allow for unmapping part of kernel mapping AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 10:21 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 11:44 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 14:01 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 14:35 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 14:55 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-03 6:13 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2017-02-03 14:22 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 05/12] arm64: kdump: protect crash dump kernel memory AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 18:00 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-01 18:25 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 10:39 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 11:54 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-03 1:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-03 11:51 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 10:45 ` James Morse
2017-02-02 11:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 11:48 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 10:31 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 14:36 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 06/12] arm64: hibernate: preserve kdump image around hibernation AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 07/12] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 08/12] arm64: kdump: add VMCOREINFO's for user-space tools AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 09/12] arm64: kdump: provide /proc/vmcore file AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 19:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 6:24 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-02 12:03 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-02 14:39 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 10/12] arm64: kdump: enable kdump in defconfig AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v31 11/12] Documentation: kdump: describe arm64 port AKASHI Takahiro
2017-02-01 12:48 ` [PATCH v31 12/12] Documentation: dt: chosen properties for arm64 kdump AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170203061317.GC29585@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).