From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:46:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: sunxi: Rename pwm0_pins to match our usual pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170206174635.wvl7fnxjhmr6e7zc@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:15:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > The pwm0_pins group name is suggesting that this is the only option usable > > for the PWM0 on the SoCs it's declared on. However, this is not the case > > and defining a second pwm0 group would be quite weird given the name of the > > first group. > > Can you elaborate on the second pwm0 option? I'm not seeing it in my datasheets. Hmmmm, I'm not sure why I did that anymore, looks like you're right... I'll drop this one, and queue the others for 4.12. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: