From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] usercopy: create enum stack_type
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:29:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216182917.19637-2-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216182917.19637-1-james.morse@arm.com>
From: Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>
This patch creates enum stack_type which is only used in usercopy.c
for now. This enum type can be used for x86 and other architecture's
thread_info.h, which may have arch_within_stack_frames().
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 19 ++++++++++---------
include/linux/thread_info.h | 13 ++++++++++---
mm/usercopy.c | 8 +-------
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index ad6f5eb07a95..7af4b8b23b8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -168,13 +168,13 @@ static inline unsigned long current_stack_pointer(void)
* entirely contained by a single stack frame.
*
* Returns:
- * 1 if within a frame
- * -1 if placed across a frame boundary (or outside stack)
- * 0 unable to determine (no frame pointers, etc)
+ * GOOD_FRAME if within a frame
+ * BAD_STACK if placed across a frame boundary (or outside stack)
+ * NOT_STACK unable to determine (no frame pointers, etc)
*/
-static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
- const void * const stackend,
- const void *obj, unsigned long len)
+static inline enum stack_type arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
+ const void * const stackend,
+ const void *obj, unsigned long len)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
const void *frame = NULL;
@@ -197,13 +197,14 @@ static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
* the copy as invalid.
*/
if (obj + len <= frame)
- return obj >= oldframe + 2 * sizeof(void *) ? 1 : -1;
+ return obj >= oldframe + 2 * sizeof(void *) ?
+ GOOD_FRAME : BAD_STACK;
oldframe = frame;
frame = *(const void * const *)frame;
}
- return -1;
+ return BAD_STACK;
#else
- return 0;
+ return NOT_STACK;
#endif
}
diff --git a/include/linux/thread_info.h b/include/linux/thread_info.h
index 58373875e8ee..a38b3be347df 100644
--- a/include/linux/thread_info.h
+++ b/include/linux/thread_info.h
@@ -22,6 +22,13 @@
#endif
#include <linux/bitops.h>
+
+enum stack_type {
+ BAD_STACK = -1,
+ NOT_STACK = 0,
+ GOOD_FRAME,
+ GOOD_STACK,
+};
#include <asm/thread_info.h>
#ifdef __KERNEL__
@@ -77,9 +84,9 @@ static inline int test_ti_thread_flag(struct thread_info *ti, int flag)
#define tif_need_resched() test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES
-static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
- const void * const stackend,
- const void *obj, unsigned long len)
+static inline enum stack_type arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
+ const void * const stackend,
+ const void *obj, unsigned long len)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
index 3c8da0af9695..3531ae735d87 100644
--- a/mm/usercopy.c
+++ b/mm/usercopy.c
@@ -16,15 +16,9 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/thread_info.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
-enum {
- BAD_STACK = -1,
- NOT_STACK = 0,
- GOOD_FRAME,
- GOOD_STACK,
-};
-
/*
* Checks if a given pointer and length is contained by the current
* stack frame (if possible).
--
2.10.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 18:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation James Morse
2017-02-16 18:29 ` James Morse [this message]
2017-04-04 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] usercopy: create enum stack_type Kees Cook
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: Add arch_within_stack_frames() for hardened usercopy James Morse
2017-02-17 0:47 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-16 18:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64/uaccess: Add hardened usercopy check for bad stack accesses James Morse
2017-02-17 0:44 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-17 18:09 ` [kernel-hardening] " Keun-O Park
2017-03-30 8:32 ` James Morse
2017-02-17 0:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64: usercopy: Implement stack frame object validation Kees Cook
2017-03-28 22:34 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-30 8:30 ` James Morse
2017-03-30 19:54 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216182917.19637-2-james.morse@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).