From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: mvneta: avoid getting buf_phys_addr from rx_desc again
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:53:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220125344.3555-3-jszhang@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170220125344.3555-1-jszhang@marvell.com>
In hot code path mvneta_rx_hwbm(), the rx_desc->buf_phys_addr is read
four times. The rx_desc is allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, it's
uncacheable if the device isn't cache-coherent, reading from uncached
memory is fairly slow. So reuse the read out phys_addr variable to
avoid the extra reading from uncached memory.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Suggested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 06df72b8da85..a25042801eec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -2082,8 +2082,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
(rx_status & MVNETA_RXD_ERR_SUMMARY)) {
err_drop_frame_ret_pool:
/* Return the buffer to the pool */
- mvneta_bm_pool_put_bp(pp->bm_priv, bm_pool,
- rx_desc->buf_phys_addr);
+ mvneta_bm_pool_put_bp(pp->bm_priv, bm_pool, phys_addr);
err_drop_frame:
dev->stats.rx_errors++;
mvneta_rx_error(pp, rx_desc);
@@ -2098,7 +2097,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
goto err_drop_frame_ret_pool;
dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(dev->dev.parent,
- rx_desc->buf_phys_addr,
+ phys_addr,
MVNETA_MH_SIZE + NET_SKB_PAD,
rx_bytes,
DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
@@ -2114,8 +2113,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
rcvd_bytes += rx_bytes;
/* Return the buffer to the pool */
- mvneta_bm_pool_put_bp(pp->bm_priv, bm_pool,
- rx_desc->buf_phys_addr);
+ mvneta_bm_pool_put_bp(pp->bm_priv, bm_pool, phys_addr);
/* leave the descriptor and buffer untouched */
continue;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 12:53 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mvneta: improve rx/tx performance Jisheng Zhang
2017-02-20 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: mvneta: avoid getting status from rx_desc as much as possible Jisheng Zhang
2017-02-20 12:53 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2017-02-20 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: mvneta: avoid reading from tx_desc " Jisheng Zhang
2017-02-20 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer DMA address Jisheng Zhang
2017-02-20 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mvneta: improve rx/tx performance Gregory CLEMENT
2017-02-21 4:37 ` Jisheng Zhang
2017-02-21 16:16 ` David Miller
2017-02-21 16:35 ` Marcin Wojtas
2017-02-24 11:56 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220125344.3555-3-jszhang@marvell.com \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).