From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:58:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: devicetree: arm: Document Marvell IAP140 In-Reply-To: References: <20170219032000.4674-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170219032000.4674-3-afaerber@suse.de> <20170220135646.2b0219c1@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20170220145825.5f7cbe74@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:16:13 +0100, Andreas F?rber wrote: > I'm confused now. According to Marvell IR [0] they are NASDAQ-listed as > MRVL. My understanding is that in that case the official vendor prefix > becomes mrvl. Why not here? Not sure why, but as of today, we have a mix of "mrvl" and "marvell" in the tree, and "marvell" is the one official listed in vendor-prefixes.txt. > Any comments on the iap140 vs. pxa1908 naming? The Communication > Processors section has disappeared from marvell.com, so I couldn't > verify whether IAP140 was renamed from PXA1908 or whether both coexist > and we should add a second compatible string here? I don't have an opinion on this because I'm not familiar with this family of Marvell SoCs. However, the only thing I would recommend is that you send a patch to update Documentation/arm/Marvell/README to document this PXA1908/IAP140 thing. This is particularly important since this document mentions PXA1908 already. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com