From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 06/55] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 execution context for nesting
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:10:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222111017.GB26976@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483943091-1364-7-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:24:02AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> With the nested virtualization support, the context of the guest
> includes EL2 register states. The host manages a set of virtual EL2
> registers. In addition to that, the guest hypervisor supposed to run in
> EL2 is now deprivilaged and runs in EL1. So, the host also manages a set
> of shadow system registers to be able to run the guest hypervisor in
> EL1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c0c8b02..ed78d73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,42 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
> NR_SYS_REGS /* Nothing after this line! */
> };
>
> +enum el2_regs {
> + ELR_EL2,
> + SPSR_EL2,
> + SP_EL2,
> + AMAIR_EL2,
> + MAIR_EL2,
> + TCR_EL2,
> + TTBR0_EL2,
> + VTCR_EL2,
> + VTTBR_EL2,
> + VMPIDR_EL2,
> + VPIDR_EL2, /* 10 */
> + MDCR_EL2,
> + CNTHCTL_EL2,
> + CNTHP_CTL_EL2,
> + CNTHP_CVAL_EL2,
> + CNTHP_TVAL_EL2,
> + CNTVOFF_EL2,
> + ACTLR_EL2,
> + AFSR0_EL2,
> + AFSR1_EL2,
> + CPTR_EL2, /* 20 */
> + ESR_EL2,
> + FAR_EL2,
> + HACR_EL2,
> + HCR_EL2,
> + HPFAR_EL2,
> + HSTR_EL2,
> + RMR_EL2,
> + RVBAR_EL2,
> + SCTLR_EL2,
> + TPIDR_EL2, /* 30 */
> + VBAR_EL2,
> + NR_EL2_REGS /* Nothing after this line! */
> +};
Why do we have a separate enum and array for the EL2 regs and not simply
expand vcpu_sysreg ?
> +
> /* 32bit mapping */
> #define c0_MPIDR (MPIDR_EL1 * 2) /* MultiProcessor ID Register */
> #define c0_CSSELR (CSSELR_EL1 * 2)/* Cache Size Selection Register */
> @@ -193,6 +229,23 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
> u64 sys_regs[NR_SYS_REGS];
> u32 copro[NR_COPRO_REGS];
> };
> +
> + u64 el2_regs[NR_EL2_REGS]; /* only used for nesting */
> + u64 shadow_sys_regs[NR_SYS_REGS]; /* only used for virtual EL2 */
> +
> + /*
> + * hw_* will be used when switching to a VM. They point to either
> + * the virtual EL2 or EL1/EL0 context depending on vcpu mode.
don't they either point to the shadow sys regs or the the normal EL1
sysregs?
> + */
> +
> + /* pointing shadow_sys_regs or sys_regs */
that's what this comment seems to indicate, so there's some duplicity
here.
> + u64 *hw_sys_regs;
> +
> + /* copy of either gp_regs.sp_el1 or el2_regs[SP_EL2] */
> + u64 hw_sp_el1;
> +
> + /* pstate written to SPSR_EL2 */
> + u64 hw_pstate;
> };
>
> typedef struct kvm_cpu_context kvm_cpu_context_t;
> @@ -277,6 +330,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>
> #define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
> #define vcpu_sys_reg(v,r) ((v)->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[(r)])
> +#define vcpu_el2_reg(v, r) ((v)->arch.ctxt.el2_regs[(r)])
> /*
> * CP14 and CP15 live in the same array, as they are backed by the
> * same system registers.
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-09 6:23 [RFC 00/55] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:23 ` [RFC 01/55] arm64: Add missing TCR hw defines Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:23 ` [RFC 02/55] KVM: arm64: Add nesting config option Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:23 ` [RFC 03/55] KVM: arm64: Add KVM nesting feature Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 04/55] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 05/55] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu_mode_el2 primitive to support nesting Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 06/55] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 execution context for nesting Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:10 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-06-26 14:33 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-03 9:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03 9:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-03 9:54 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03 14:44 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-03 15:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 07/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Add virtual EL2 state emulation framework Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-01 20:05 ` Bandan Das
2017-06-02 11:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-02 17:36 ` Bandan Das
2017-06-02 19:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-02 19:25 ` Bandan Das
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 08/55] KVM: arm64: Set virtual EL2 context depending on the guest exception level Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:14 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-01 20:22 ` Bandan Das
2017-06-02 8:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 09/55] KVM: arm64: Set shadow EL1 registers for virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 10/55] KVM: arm64: Synchronize EL1 system registers on virtual EL2 entry and exit Jintack Lim
2017-06-06 20:16 ` Bandan Das
2017-06-07 4:26 ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 11/55] KVM: arm64: Emulate taking an exception to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-06 20:21 ` Bandan Das
2017-06-06 20:38 ` Jintack Lim
2017-06-06 22:07 ` Bandan Das
2017-06-06 23:16 ` Jintack Lim
2017-06-07 17:21 ` Bandan Das
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 12/55] KVM: arm64: Handle EL2 register access traps Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-22 11:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 13/55] KVM: arm64: Handle eret instruction traps Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 14/55] KVM: arm64: Take account of system " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 15/55] KVM: arm64: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 16/55] KVM: arm64: Forward VM reg traps to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:39 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 17/55] KVM: arm64: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 in virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:40 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 18/55] KVM: arm64: Forward traps due to HCR_EL2.NV1 bit to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 19/55] KVM: arm64: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 20/55] KVM: arm64: Forward CPACR_EL1 traps to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 21/55] KVM: arm64: Forward HVC instruction " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-26 15:21 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-03 9:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03 9:31 ` Andrew Jones
2017-07-03 9:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03 12:03 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-03 12:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-03 13:29 ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 22/55] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI call from the guest Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 23/55] KVM: arm64: Forward WFX to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 24/55] KVM: arm64: Forward FP exceptions " Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 25/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Let vcpu thread modify its own active state Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 12:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 26/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Add VGIC data structures for the nesting Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 27/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Emulate GICH interface on GICv2 Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 28/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Prepare vgic state for the nested VM Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 29/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Set up the prepared vgic state Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 30/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Inject irqs to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:16 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 31/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Inject maintenance interrupts " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 32/55] KVM: arm/arm64: register GICH iodev for " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:21 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 33/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Remove unused params in mmu functions Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 34/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract stage-2 MMU state into a separate structure Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 35/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Support mmu for the virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:38 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 36/55] KVM: arm64: Invalidate virtual EL2 TLB entries when needed Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 37/55] KVM: arm64: Setup vttbr_el2 on each VM entry Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 38/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Make mmu functions non-static Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 39/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Add mmu context for the nesting Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 40/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle vttbr_el2 write operation from the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 17:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 41/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 18:09 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 42/55] KVM: arm64: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 43/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 44/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Move kvm_is_write_fault to header file Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 45/55] KVM: arm64: KVM: Inject stage-2 page faults Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 46/55] KVM: arm64: Add more info to the S2 translation result Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 47/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Forward the guest hypervisor's stage 2 permission faults Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 18:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 48/55] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI instruction Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 49/55] KVM: arm64: Fixes to toggle_cache for nesting Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 50/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract kvm_phys_addr_ioremap() function Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 51/55] KVM: arm64: Expose physical address of vcpu interface Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 52/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Create a vcpu mapping for the nested VM Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 53/55] KVM: arm64: Reflect shadow VMPIDR_EL2 value to MPIDR_EL1 Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 54/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Adjust virtual offset considering nesting Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 19:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09 6:24 ` [RFC 55/55] KVM: arm64: Enable nested virtualization Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 15:05 ` [RFC 00/55] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM David Hildenbrand
2017-01-10 16:18 ` Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 18:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-24 10:28 ` Jintack Lim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222111017.GB26976@cbox \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).