linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 41/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:09:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222180902.GW26976@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483943091-1364-42-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:24:37AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> 
> Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables for the nested VMs as well as the
> stage 2 page table for the guest hypervisor.
> 
> Note: A bunch of the code in mmu.c relating to MMU notifiers is
> currently dealt with in an extremely abrupt way, for example by clearing
> out an entire shadow stage-2 table.  Probably we can do smarter with
> some sort of rmap structure.

I think we need to do better than this patch for merging something
upstream.  At least the current approach will not perform well if we run
more than one guest hypervisor on the system.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h   |  7 ++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c               |  6 ++-
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c               | 11 +++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 13 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu-nested.c      | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 1b3309c..ae3aa39 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,13 @@ static inline unsigned int kvm_get_vmid_bits(void)
>  	return 8;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
> +static inline int kvm_nested_s2_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return 0; }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_teardown(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_wp(struct kvm *kvm) { }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(struct kvm *kvm) { }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_flush(struct kvm *kvm) { }
> +
>  static inline u64 kvm_get_vttbr(struct kvm_s2_vmid *vmid,
>  				struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 6fa5754..dc2795f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
>  		if (kvm->vcpus[i]) {
> +			kvm_nested_s2_teardown(kvm->vcpus[i]);
>  			kvm_arch_vcpu_free(kvm->vcpus[i]);
>  			kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
>  		}
> @@ -333,6 +334,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	vcpu->arch.hw_mmu = mmu;
>  	vcpu->arch.hw_vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(&mmu->vmid, mmu);
> +	kvm_nested_s2_init(vcpu);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -871,8 +873,10 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * Ensure a rebooted VM will fault in RAM pages and detect if the
>  	 * guest MMU is turned off and flush the caches as needed.
>  	 */
> -	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
> +	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) {
>  		stage2_unmap_vm(vcpu->kvm);
> +		kvm_nested_s2_unmap(vcpu);
> +	}
>  
>  	vcpu_reset_hcr(vcpu);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index 98b42e8..1677a87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ static void stage2_flush_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots)
>  		stage2_flush_memslot(&kvm->arch.mmu, memslot);
>  
> +	kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_flush(kvm);
> +
>  	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
>  }
> @@ -1240,6 +1242,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
>  
>  	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  	kvm_stage2_wp_range(kvm, &kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
> +	kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_wp(kvm);
>  	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>  }
> @@ -1278,6 +1281,7 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		gfn_t gfn_offset, unsigned long mask)
>  {
>  	kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, slot, gfn_offset, mask);
> +	kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_wp(kvm);
>  }
>  
>  static void coherent_cache_guest_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> @@ -1604,6 +1608,7 @@ static int handle_hva_to_gpa(struct kvm *kvm,
>  static int kvm_unmap_hva_handler(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, void *data)
>  {
>  	kvm_unmap_stage2_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, gpa, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(kvm);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1642,6 +1647,7 @@ static int kvm_set_spte_handler(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, void *data)
>  	 * through this calling path.
>  	 */
>  	stage2_set_pte(&kvm->arch.mmu, NULL, gpa, pte, 0);
> +	kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(kvm);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1675,6 +1681,8 @@ static int kvm_age_hva_handler(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, void *data)
>  	if (pte_none(*pte))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/* TODO: Handle nested_mmu structures here as well */
> +
>  	return stage2_ptep_test_and_clear_young(pte);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1694,6 +1702,8 @@ static int kvm_test_age_hva_handler(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, void *data)
>  	if (!pte_none(*pte))		/* Just a page... */
>  		return pte_young(*pte);
>  
> +	/* TODO: Handle nested_mmu structures here as well */

These TODO's should be addresses somehow as well.

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1959,6 +1969,7 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  	kvm_unmap_stage2_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, gpa, size);
> +	kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(kvm);
>  	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index fdc9327..e4d5d54 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -328,6 +328,12 @@ static inline unsigned int kvm_get_vmid_bits(void)
>  struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *get_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vttbr);
>  struct kvm_s2_mmu *vcpu_get_active_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  bool handle_vttbr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vttbr);
> +void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int kvm_nested_s2_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_nested_s2_teardown(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_wp(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_flush(struct kvm *kvm);
>  #else
>  static inline struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *get_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  						       u64 vttbr)
> @@ -343,6 +349,13 @@ static inline bool handle_vttbr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vttbr)
>  {
>  	return false;
>  }
> +
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
> +static inline int kvm_nested_s2_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return 0; }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_teardown(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_wp(struct kvm *kvm) { }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(struct kvm *kvm) { }
> +static inline void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_flush(struct kvm *kvm) { }
>  #endif
>  
>  static inline u64 kvm_get_vttbr(struct kvm_s2_vmid *vmid,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu-nested.c
> index 0811d94..b22b78c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu-nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu-nested.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) 2016 - Columbia University
>   * Author: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> + * Author: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
>   *
>   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>   * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> @@ -22,6 +23,86 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_nested.h>
>  
> +
> +/* expects kvm->mmu_lock to be held */
> +void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_wp(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> +	struct list_head *nested_mmu_list;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
> +			cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +		nested_mmu_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.nested_mmu_list;
> +		list_for_each_entry_rcu(nested_mmu, nested_mmu_list, list)
> +			kvm_stage2_wp_range(kvm, &nested_mmu->mmu,
> +				    0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* expects kvm->mmu_lock to be held */
> +void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_unmap(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> +	struct list_head *nested_mmu_list;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
> +			cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +		nested_mmu_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.nested_mmu_list;
> +		list_for_each_entry_rcu(nested_mmu, nested_mmu_list, list)
> +			kvm_unmap_stage2_range(&nested_mmu->mmu,
> +				       0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_nested_s2_all_vcpus_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> +	struct list_head *nested_mmu_list;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
> +			cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +		nested_mmu_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.nested_mmu_list;
> +		list_for_each_entry_rcu(nested_mmu, nested_mmu_list, list)
> +			kvm_stage2_flush_range(&nested_mmu->mmu,
> +				       0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> +	struct list_head *nested_mmu_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.nested_mmu_list;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(nested_mmu, nested_mmu_list, list)
> +		kvm_unmap_stage2_range(&nested_mmu->mmu, 0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
> +}

Did we change the functionality of this function in this patch as well
or are we just moving it around?  I can't really tell.


Thanks,
-Christoffer

> +
> +int kvm_nested_s2_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_nested_s2_teardown(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> +	struct list_head *nested_mmu_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.nested_mmu_list;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(nested_mmu, nested_mmu_list, list)
> +		__kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&nested_mmu->mmu);
> +}
> +
>  struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *get_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vttbr)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *mmu;
> @@ -89,15 +170,6 @@ static struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *create_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return nested_mmu;
>  }
>  
> -static void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> -	struct list_head *nested_mmu_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.nested_mmu_list;
> -
> -	list_for_each_entry_rcu(nested_mmu, nested_mmu_list, list)
> -		kvm_unmap_stage2_range(&nested_mmu->mmu, 0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
> -}
> -
>  bool handle_vttbr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vttbr)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_nested_s2_mmu *nested_mmu;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-22 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-09  6:23 [RFC 00/55] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:23 ` [RFC 01/55] arm64: Add missing TCR hw defines Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:23 ` [RFC 02/55] KVM: arm64: Add nesting config option Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:23 ` [RFC 03/55] KVM: arm64: Add KVM nesting feature Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 04/55] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 05/55] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu_mode_el2 primitive to support nesting Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 06/55] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 execution context for nesting Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-26 14:33     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-03  9:03       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03  9:32         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-03  9:54           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03 14:44             ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-03 15:30               ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 07/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Add virtual EL2 state emulation framework Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:12   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-01 20:05   ` Bandan Das
2017-06-02 11:51     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-02 17:36       ` Bandan Das
2017-06-02 19:06         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-02 19:25           ` Bandan Das
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 08/55] KVM: arm64: Set virtual EL2 context depending on the guest exception level Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:14   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-01 20:22   ` Bandan Das
2017-06-02  8:48     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 09/55] KVM: arm64: Set shadow EL1 registers for virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 10/55] KVM: arm64: Synchronize EL1 system registers on virtual EL2 entry and exit Jintack Lim
2017-06-06 20:16   ` Bandan Das
2017-06-07  4:26     ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 11/55] KVM: arm64: Emulate taking an exception to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:28   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-06 20:21   ` Bandan Das
2017-06-06 20:38     ` Jintack Lim
2017-06-06 22:07       ` Bandan Das
2017-06-06 23:16         ` Jintack Lim
2017-06-07 17:21           ` Bandan Das
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 12/55] KVM: arm64: Handle EL2 register access traps Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:30   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-22 11:31   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 13/55] KVM: arm64: Handle eret instruction traps Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 14/55] KVM: arm64: Take account of system " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:34   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 15/55] KVM: arm64: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 16/55] KVM: arm64: Forward VM reg traps to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:39   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 17/55] KVM: arm64: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 in virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:40   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 18/55] KVM: arm64: Forward traps due to HCR_EL2.NV1 bit to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:41   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 19/55] KVM: arm64: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 20/55] KVM: arm64: Forward CPACR_EL1 traps to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 21/55] KVM: arm64: Forward HVC instruction " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 11:47   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-26 15:21     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-03  9:08       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03  9:31         ` Andrew Jones
2017-07-03  9:51           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-03 12:03             ` Will Deacon
2017-07-03 12:35               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-03 13:29         ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 22/55] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI call from the guest Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 23/55] KVM: arm64: Forward WFX to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 24/55] KVM: arm64: Forward FP exceptions " Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 25/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Let vcpu thread modify its own active state Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 12:27   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 26/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Add VGIC data structures for the nesting Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 27/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Emulate GICH interface on GICv2 Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:06   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 28/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Prepare vgic state for the nested VM Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:12   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 29/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Set up the prepared vgic state Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 30/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Inject irqs to the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:16   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 31/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Inject maintenance interrupts " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 32/55] KVM: arm/arm64: register GICH iodev for " Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:21   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 33/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Remove unused params in mmu functions Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 34/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract stage-2 MMU state into a separate structure Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 35/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Support mmu for the virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:38   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 36/55] KVM: arm64: Invalidate virtual EL2 TLB entries when needed Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 37/55] KVM: arm64: Setup vttbr_el2 on each VM entry Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 38/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Make mmu functions non-static Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 39/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Add mmu context for the nesting Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 13:34   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 40/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle vttbr_el2 write operation from the guest hypervisor Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 17:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 41/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 18:09   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 42/55] KVM: arm64: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 43/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 44/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Move kvm_is_write_fault to header file Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 45/55] KVM: arm64: KVM: Inject stage-2 page faults Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 46/55] KVM: arm64: Add more info to the S2 translation result Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 47/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Forward the guest hypervisor's stage 2 permission faults Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 18:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 48/55] KVM: arm64: Emulate TLBI instruction Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 49/55] KVM: arm64: Fixes to toggle_cache for nesting Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 50/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract kvm_phys_addr_ioremap() function Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 51/55] KVM: arm64: Expose physical address of vcpu interface Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 52/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Create a vcpu mapping for the nested VM Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 53/55] KVM: arm64: Reflect shadow VMPIDR_EL2 value to MPIDR_EL1 Jintack Lim
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 54/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Adjust virtual offset considering nesting Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 19:28   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-09  6:24 ` [RFC 55/55] KVM: arm64: Enable nested virtualization Jintack Lim
2017-01-09 15:05 ` [RFC 00/55] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM David Hildenbrand
2017-01-10 16:18   ` Jintack Lim
2017-02-22 18:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-24 10:28   ` Jintack Lim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170222180902.GW26976@cbox \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).