From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:20:28 -0800 Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC In-Reply-To: <20170222231738.HXRSmi86@smtp1o.mail.yandex.net> References: <20170222231738.HXRSmi86@smtp1o.mail.yandex.net> Message-ID: <20170224002028.miupa6dzefgxbfse@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > 2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard ??? > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the > > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex. > > > > > > Add support for it. > > > > > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with > > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source. > > > > Missing SoB. > > > > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't? > > There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related > drivers RFC. > > Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is > available now. > > For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess -- > so it's not RFC. It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC tags. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: