From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:24:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] clk: sunxi-ng: rename sun8i-h3 driver to sunxi-h3-h5 In-Reply-To: <20170226011956.53581-3-icenowy@aosc.xyz> References: <20170226011956.53581-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> <20170226011956.53581-3-icenowy@aosc.xyz> Message-ID: <20170227122444.6523qu4wwm4ihlfx@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:19:51AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > As the CCU in the Allwinner H5 SoC is very similar to the one in H3, > rename the H3 driver to sunxi-h3-h5 so that it can be extended with H5 > support. > > Trasitional header symlinks are created, to ensure current device tree > files which included sun8i-h3-ccu.h can compile. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng Just like for the R40, I wonder whether this is needed at all. We have a lot of other drivers that we don't have to rename to support new SoCs. This is kind of weird to make an exception for this one only. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: