From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:26:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline In-Reply-To: References: <1487211578-11360-15-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170302160257.GK3220@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20170303230645.GR21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20170304131329.GV3220@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20170310120902.1daebc7b@vento.lan> <5e1183f4-774f-413a-628a-96e0df321faf@xs4all.nl> <20170311101408.272a9187@vento.lan> <20170311153229.yrdjmggb3p2suhdw@ihha.localdomain> Message-ID: <20170311202621.GA15777@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi! > >>I tend to agree with that. > > > >I agree as well. > > > >This is in line with how existing drivers behave, too. > > > Well, sounds like there is consensus on this topic. I guess I'll > go ahead and remove the control inheritance support. I suppose > having a control appear in two places (subdev and video nodes) can > be confusing. I guess that's way to go. It is impossible to change userland APIs once the patch is merged... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html