From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:12:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common
 soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPeFw-qRcznSvw-+ZYxObXTPjE4bRM37=sGf8aWbR31WEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170314164653.15771-1-krzk@kernel.org>
 <20170314164653.15771-5-krzk@kernel.org>
 <20170315101007.xtnwz7mmkt446sgd@dell>
 <CAJKOXPeFw-qRcznSvw-+ZYxObXTPjE4bRM37=sGf8aWbR31WEg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170315121212.p2xu64dzhrzmjbxv@dell>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> >> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
> >> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is also needed for patch 5/5 in the set so I was wondering if
> this can be put on separate branch and then shared if phy maintainers
> would need it?

What is the dependency? 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog