public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] mfd: syscon: atmel-smc: Remove unused helpers/macros
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:34:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316113438.790bfb67@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316101627.ecp63pr5v6l4neam@dell>

Hi Lee,

On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:16:27 +0000
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > All macros prefixed with AT91[SAM9]_SMC have been replaced by equivalent
> > definitions prefixed with ATMEL_SMC, and the at91sam9_smc_xxxx() helpers
> > are no longer used.
> > Drop these definitions before someone starts using them again.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h | 152 -----------------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 152 deletions(-)  
> 
> For my own reference:
>   Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> What is the plan for this set?
> 
> I only see 2 patches.

You mean, you only see 2 patches in your Inbox (that would be weird,
because you're in the CC list of all patches), or only 2 patches that
should go in your tree?

> Can they both be applied?

All patches should go through the same tree, because changes in
drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c are depending on changes done in the MFD
subsystem.

If Nicolas is okay with that, maybe you can take everything through the
MFD tree (I don't expect any conflicts in drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c).

Regards,

Boris

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-16  8:30 [PATCH 0/7] memory: atmel-ebi: Add PM ops Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mfd: syscon: atmel-smc: Add new helpers to ease SMC regs manipulation Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16 10:15   ` Lee Jones
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] memory: atmel-ebi: Simplify SMC config code Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] memory: atmel-ebi: Stop using reg_field objects for simple things Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mfd: syscon: atmel-smc: Remove unused helpers/macros Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16 10:16   ` Lee Jones
2017-03-16 10:34     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-03-16 12:18       ` Lee Jones
2017-03-27  9:25         ` Nicolas Ferre
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] memory: atmel-ebi: Change naming scheme Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] memory: atmel-ebi: Add missing ->numcs assignment Boris Brezillon
2017-03-16  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] memory: atmel-ebi: Add PM ops Boris Brezillon
2017-03-27  9:25 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Nicolas Ferre
2017-03-27 15:14   ` Lee Jones
2017-03-27 15:21     ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-04-03 10:01 ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170316113438.790bfb67@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox