From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:34:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] mfd: syscon: atmel-smc: Remove unused helpers/macros In-Reply-To: <20170316101627.ecp63pr5v6l4neam@dell> References: <1489653034-17777-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1489653034-17777-5-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20170316101627.ecp63pr5v6l4neam@dell> Message-ID: <20170316113438.790bfb67@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Lee, On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:16:27 +0000 Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > All macros prefixed with AT91[SAM9]_SMC have been replaced by equivalent > > definitions prefixed with ATMEL_SMC, and the at91sam9_smc_xxxx() helpers > > are no longer used. > > Drop these definitions before someone starts using them again. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > --- > > include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h | 152 ----------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 152 deletions(-) > > For my own reference: > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones > > What is the plan for this set? > > I only see 2 patches. You mean, you only see 2 patches in your Inbox (that would be weird, because you're in the CC list of all patches), or only 2 patches that should go in your tree? > Can they both be applied? All patches should go through the same tree, because changes in drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c are depending on changes done in the MFD subsystem. If Nicolas is okay with that, maybe you can take everything through the MFD tree (I don't expect any conflicts in drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c). Regards, Boris