From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:13:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition In-Reply-To: References: <20161122213434.14788-1-mmarek@suse.com> <20170310175854.GE18894@arm.com> Message-ID: <20170320121328.GH17263@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek : > > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a): > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which > >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The > >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide > >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools. > >>> > >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas > >>> Cc: Will Deacon > >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++--- > >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it, > > > > Great, please merge it. > > > >> but I don't see > >> the rest of the series queued anywhere. > > > > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree. > > > > I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec. > > > So, how shall we handle this series? > > > I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree, > but 6/6 will be postponed in the case. > > > > If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series > to linux-kbuild. Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch: Acked-by: Will Deacon So please take this via linux-kbuild. Will