From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tj@kernel.org (Tejun Heo) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:56:50 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] ATA/ARM: convert ARM/DaVinci to use libata PATA drivers In-Reply-To: <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> References: <1489509414-11491-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <20170316213255.GF1480@htj.duckdns.org> <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> Message-ID: <20170321165650.GA3706@htj.duckdns.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:08:26PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > Looks fine to me from libata side. Once it gets tested, how should > > the patches be routed? I don't think it'd make sense to route them > > separately. > > Hi Tejun, I can take the series through ARM-SoC tree with your ack. Once the review points are addressed, please feel free to add Acked-by: Tejun Heo and route through the arm tree. Thanks. -- tejun