From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] arm64: kill acpi_set_mailbox_entry()
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:37:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170321183755.GA2976@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321181554.GF29116@leverpostej>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:15:54PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:00:40PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:04:49AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > > +static struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailboxes[NR_CPUS];
> >
> > Nit: If I am not mistaken it can be made a percpu pointer.
>
> Unfortunately, we don't set up the percpu areas until we know how many
> CPUs are possible (i.e. after we've parsed the MADT).
>
> The flow looks like:
>
> start_kernel()
> setup_arch()
> smp_init_cpus()
> acpi_table_parse_madt()
> acpi_parse_gic_cpu_interface()
> acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() // setup cpu mailbox here
The mailbox data yes, not the pointer at which it is mapped (which
is what gets stashed in mailboxes[]).
> ...
> setup_per_cpu_areas() // percpu available here
>
> Otherwise, I completely agree that a percpu pointer would be the right
> thing to do.
Yes but the only purpose of the mailboxes array is to stash the
ioremap'ed VA after a secondary has been booted (through
cpu_ops->cpu_boot which is called to boot secondaries when per_cpu areas
are already set-up) to run checks in cpu_postboot() method, hence my
suggestion.
>
> > Other than that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>
> I take it this stands, given the above?
Yes, thanks for making this change.
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-10 11:04 [PATCH 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 01/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 02/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 03/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 04/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 05/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 06/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 07/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 09/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 10/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 11/14] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 18:33 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 12/14] arm64: kill acpi_set_mailbox_entry() Mark Rutland
2017-03-21 18:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-21 18:15 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-21 18:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-03-21 18:53 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-22 11:38 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 13/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-03-10 11:04 ` [PATCH 14/14] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu " Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 6:00 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-03-14 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 12:12 ` Jayachandran C.
2017-03-17 10:24 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-12 2:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-10 22:14 ` [PATCH 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Jeremy Linton
2017-03-14 11:49 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 18:47 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 22:06 ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-03-15 2:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-22 12:19 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-22 14:06 ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2017-03-22 23:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-15 15:34 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-16 13:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-20 18:11 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-03-22 9:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-03-22 15:59 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-03 10:41 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-03 11:12 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 9:32 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-03-28 11:31 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-28 14:41 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170321183755.GA2976@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).