From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: add arm/arm64 include symlinks
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:20:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322002027.GA2984@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170320230337.GB78325@google.com>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:00:58AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Allow including of dtsi files in an architecture-independent manner.
> > Some dtsi files may be shared between architectures and one suggestion
> > was to have symlinks and let these includes get accessed via a
> > #include <arm64/foo.dtsi>
> > So add the necessary symlinks for arm32.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > ---
> > Suggested by Olof in response to the patch adding direct symlinks
> > for cros-ec includes.
> >
> > Tested with adapted rk3399-Gru dtsi files and while we only need this arm64
> > version right now, it might make sense to already have both the arm32 and
> > arm64 versions ready.
>
> FWIW, tested fine here too (for the same platform).
>
> I guess this works fine, if it makes people happy. It also allows some
> weird #include paths. e.g.:
>
> #include <arm64/include/arm/include/arm64/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi>
>
> I guess we can call that an entertaining feature, and not a bug?
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>
> Where should this go? I'd like not to wait another few months before
> sending my Gru/Kevin DTS again.
Checked into shared/dt-symlinks on the arm-soc repo now (and merged into
next/dt and next/dt64). Please use that branch as a base for DT material that
will use this.
-Olof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-26 6:00 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: add arm/arm64 include symlinks Heiko Stuebner
2017-02-26 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: " Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-20 23:03 ` Brian Norris
2017-03-22 0:20 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322002027.GA2984@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).