From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 28/41] arm64: KVM: Treat SVE use by guests as undefined instruction execution
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:06:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322170658.GF19950@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490194274-30569-29-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:50:58PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> We don't currently support context-switching of Scalable Vector
> Extension context between vcpus, and the SVE access exception is
> thus left masked by default at EL2 when running a vcpu.
>
> However, there's nothing to stop a guest trying to use SVE. If it
> does, we'll get an SVE access exception to EL2 which will cause KVM
> to panic since this exception isn't yet recognised.
>
> This patch adds knowledge to KVM about the SVE access exception,
> translating it into an undefined instruction exception injected to
> the vcpu.
>
> This prevents a malicious guest from panicking the host by
> attempted SVE use.
>
> SVE-enabled guests will still not work properly for now, but they
> won't take the host down.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
As a heads-up, this is handled implicitly by kvm_handle_unknown_ec()
since commit ba4dd156eabdca93 ("arm64: KVM: Survive unknown traps from
guests"). That also logs a (ratelimited) warning regarding the
unimplemented trap handling.
Given that, I think we can drop this patch until actual support lands.
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index fa1b18e..e43b147 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,13 @@ static int kvm_handle_unknown_ec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int handle_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> + /* Until SVE is supported for guests: */
> + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
> [0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX] = kvm_handle_unknown_ec,
> [ESR_ELx_EC_WFx] = kvm_handle_wfx,
> @@ -159,6 +166,7 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
> [ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64] = handle_hvc,
> [ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64] = handle_smc,
> [ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64] = kvm_handle_sys_reg,
> + [ESR_ELx_EC_SVE] = handle_sve,
> [ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW] = kvm_handle_guest_abort,
> [ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW] = kvm_handle_guest_abort,
> [ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW]= kvm_handle_guest_debug,
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 14:50 [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) core support Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/41] arm64: signal: Refactor sigcontext parsing in rt_sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/41] arm64: signal: factor frame layout and population into separate passes Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/41] arm64: signal: factor out signal frame record allocation Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/41] arm64: signal: Allocate extra sigcontext space as needed Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/41] arm64: signal: Parse extra_context during sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/41] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/41] arm64/sve: Allow kernel-mode NEON to be disabled in Kconfig Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/41] arm64/sve: Low-level save/restore code Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/41] arm64/sve: Boot-time feature detection and reporting Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/41] arm64/sve: Boot-time feature enablement Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/41] arm64/sve: Expand task_struct for Scalable Vector Extension state Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:20 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 10:49 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/41] arm64/sve: Save/restore SVE state on context switch paths Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/41] arm64/sve: [BROKEN] Basic support for KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/41] Revert "arm64/sve: Allow kernel-mode NEON to be disabled in Kconfig" Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/41] arm64/sve: Restore working FPSIMD save/restore around signals Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/41] arm64/sve: signal: Add SVE state record to sigcontext Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/41] arm64/sve: signal: Dump Scalable Vector Extension registers to user stack Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/41] arm64/sve: signal: Restore FPSIMD/SVE state in rt_sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/41] arm64/sve: Avoid corruption when replacing the SVE state Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/41] arm64/sve: traps: Add descriptive string for SVE exceptions Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/41] arm64/sve: Enable SVE on demand for userspace Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:48 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:24 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 11:30 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-23 11:52 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 12:07 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 13:40 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 13:45 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/41] arm64/sve: Implement FPSIMD-only context for tasks not using SVE Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/41] arm64/sve: Move ZEN handling to the common task_fpsimd_load() path Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:55 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:52 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/41] arm64/sve: Discard SVE state on system call Dave Martin
2017-03-22 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:59 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/41] arm64/sve: Avoid preempt_disable() during sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/41] arm64/sve: Avoid stale user register state after SVE access exception Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/41] arm64/sve: ptrace support Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/41] arm64: KVM: Treat SVE use by guests as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-03-22 17:06 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-03-23 12:10 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/41] prctl: Add skeleton for PR_SVE_{SET, GET}_VL controls Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/41] arm64/sve: Track vector length for each task Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/41] arm64/sve: Set CPU vector length to match current task Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/41] arm64/sve: Factor out clearing of tasks' SVE regs Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/41] arm64/sve: Wire up vector length control prctl() calls Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/41] arm64/sve: Disallow VL setting for individual threads by default Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/41] arm64/sve: Add vector length inheritance control Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/41] arm64/sve: ptrace: Wire up vector length control and reporting Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/41] arm64/sve: Enable default vector length control via procfs Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/41] arm64/sve: Detect SVE via the cpufeature framework Dave Martin
2017-03-23 14:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-23 14:37 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 14:43 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 39/41] arm64/sve: Migrate to cpucap based detection for runtime SVE code Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 40/41] arm64/sve: Allocate task SVE context storage dynamically Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 41/41] arm64/sve: Documentation: Add overview of the SVE userspace ABI Dave Martin
2017-03-31 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) core support Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-03 9:45 ` Dave Martin
2017-04-03 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-03 10:51 ` Dave Martin
2017-04-03 10:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322170658.GF19950@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).