From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/8] arm64: efi: remove pointless dummy .reloc section
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:00:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323190051.14882-7-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170323190051.14882-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
The kernel's EFI PE/COFF header contains a dummy .reloc section, and
an explanatory comment that claims that this is required for the EFI
application loader to accept the Image as a relocatable image (i.e.,
one that can be loaded at any offset and fixed up in place)
This was inherited from the x86 implementation, which has elaborate host
tooling to mangle the PE/COFF header post-link time, and which populates
the .reloc section with a single dummy base relocation. On ARM, no such
tooling exists, and the .reloc section remains empty, and is never even
exposed via the BaseRelocationTable directory entry, which is where the
PE/COFF loader looks for it.
The PE/COFF spec is unclear about relocatable images that do not require
any fixups, but the EDK2 implementation, which is the de facto reference
for PE/COFF in the UEFI space, clearly does not care, and explicitly
mentions (in a comment) that relocatable images with no base relocations
are perfectly fine, as long as they don't have the RELOCS_STRIPPED
attribute set (which is not the case for our PE/COFF image)
So simply remove the .reloc section altogether.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
| 22 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
--git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-header.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-header.S
index 515624bbfcd0..8786d58af2df 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-header.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-header.S
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
.short 0
coff_header:
.short 0xaa64 // AArch64
- .short 2 // nr_sections
+ .short 1 // nr_sections
.long 0 // TimeDateStamp
.long 0 // PointerToSymbolTable
.long 0 // NumberOfSymbols
@@ -71,26 +71,6 @@ extra_header_fields:
// Section table
section_table:
-
- /*
- * The EFI application loader requires a relocation section
- * because EFI applications must be relocatable. This is a
- * dummy section as far as we are concerned.
- */
- .ascii ".reloc"
- .byte 0
- .byte 0 // end of 0 padding of section name
- .long 0
- .long 0
- .long 0 // SizeOfRawData
- .long 0 // PointerToRawData
- .long 0 // PointerToRelocations
- .long 0 // PointerToLineNumbers
- .short 0 // NumberOfRelocations
- .short 0 // NumberOfLineNumbers
- .long 0x42000040 // Characteristics (section flags)
-
-
.ascii ".text"
.byte 0
.byte 0
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 19:00 [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: efi: PE/COFF cleanup/hardening Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] include: pe.h: allow for use in assembly Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] include: pe.h: add some missing definitions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64: efi: move EFI header and related data to a separate .S file Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] arm64: efi: clean up Image header after PE header has been split off Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 18:26 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-30 18:26 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] arm64: efi: remove forbidden values from the PE/COFF header Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 19:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] arm64: efi: replace open coded constants with symbolic ones Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] arm64: efi: split Image code and data into separate PE/COFF sections Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 18:29 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-04 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: efi: PE/COFF cleanup/hardening Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-04 16:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-04 17:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170323190051.14882-7-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).