[PATCH v33 05/14] arm64: mm: allow for unmapping part of kernel mapping

[takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)]

Ard,

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:57:02AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 23 March 2017 at 11:43, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:35:53AM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> >> Hi Akashi,
> >>
> >> On 15/03/17 09:59, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> > create_pgd_mapping() is enhanced here so that it will accept
> >> > PAGE_KERNEL_INVALID protection attribute and unmap a given range of memory.
> >> >
> >> > The feature will be used in a later kdump patch to implement the protection
> >> > against possible corruption of crash dump kernel memory which is to be set
> >> > aside from ther other memory on primary kernel.
> >>
> >> Nit: ther- > the
> >
> > Fix it.
> >
> >> > Note that, in this implementation, it assumes that all the range of memory
> >> > to be processed is mapped in page-level since the only current user is
> >> > kdump where page mappings are also required.
> >>
> >> Using create_pgd_mapping() like this means the mappings will be updated via the
> >> fixmap which is unnecessary as the page tables will be part of mapped memory. In
> >
> > This might be a reason that we would go for (un)map_kernel_range()
> > over create_pgd_mapping() (? not sure)
> >
> 
> Yes, that is why I suggested it. We already use it to unmap the init
> segment at the end of boot, but I do take your point about it being
> documented as operating on kernel VMAs only.
> 
> Looking at the code, it shouldn't matter (it does not touch or reason
> about VMAs at all, it only walks the page tables and unmaps them), but
> I agree it is better not to rely on that.

OK

> But instead of clearing all permissions, which apparently requires
> changes to alloc_init_pte(), and introduces the restriction that the
> region should be mapped down to pages, could we not simply clear
> PTE_VALID on the region, like we do for debug_pagealloc()?

Now that we are only using page-level mappings for crash kernel memory,
__change_page_common() should work and it even has no concerns that
James pointed out.
I will update my patch soon.

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> 
> >> the worst case this adds an extra tlbi for every 2MB of crash image when we map
> >> or unmap it. I don't think this matters.
> >>
> >> This code used to be __init and it is the only user of FIX_PTE, so there won't
> >> be any existing runtime users. The two arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres() calls in
> >> kexec are both protected by the kexec_mutex, and the call in hibernate happens
> >> after disable_nonboot_cpus(), so these callers can't race with each other.
> >>
> >> This looks safe to me.
> >>
> >>
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> >> > index d28dbcf596b6..cb359a3927ef 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> >> > @@ -128,7 +128,10 @@ static void alloc_init_pte(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> >> >     do {
> >> >             pte_t old_pte = *pte;
> >> >
> >> > -           set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
> >> > +           if (pgprot_val(prot))
> >> > +                   set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
> >> > +           else
> >> > +                   pte_clear(null, null, pte);
> >>
> >> Lowercase NULLs? This relies on these values never being used... __set_fixmap()
> >> in the same file passes &init_mm and the address, can we do the same to be
> >> consistent?
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Takahiro AKASHI
> >
> >>
> >> >             pfn++;
> >> >
> >> >             /*
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> James
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel