From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] IOVA allocation improvements for iommu-dma
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:40:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331124051.GI8967@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1489581865.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Hi Robin, Joerg,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:33:13PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Here's the first bit of lock contention removal to chew on - feedback
> welcome! Note that for the current users of the io-pgtable framework,
> this is most likely to simply push more contention onto the io-pgtable
> lock, so may not show a great improvement alone. Will and I both have
> rough proof-of-concept implementations of lock-free io-pgtable code
> which we need to sit down and agree on at some point, hopefullt fairly
> soon.
>
> I've taken the opportunity to do a bit of cleanup and refactoring
> within the series to make the final state of the code nicer, but the
> diffstat still turns out surprisingly reasonable in the end - it would
> actually be negative but for the new comments!
>
> Magnus, Shimoda-san, the first two patches should be of interest as they
> constitute the allocation rework I mentioned a while back[1] - if you
> still need to implement that scary workaround, this should make it
> simple to hook IPMMU-specific calls into the alloc and free paths, and
> let the driver take care of the details internally.
What's the plan for merging this? Whilst we still have the iopgtable lock
contention to resolve, this is a good incremental step towards improving
our scalability and sits nicely alongside the SMMUv2 TLB improvements I
just queued.
Thanks,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 13:33 [PATCH 0/3] IOVA allocation improvements for iommu-dma Robin Murphy
2017-03-15 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/dma: Convert to address-based allocation Robin Murphy
2017-03-15 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/dma: Clean up MSI IOVA allocation Robin Murphy
2017-03-15 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/dma: Plumb in the per-CPU IOVA caches Robin Murphy
2017-03-16 13:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] IOVA allocation improvements for iommu-dma Sunil Kovvuri
2017-03-22 17:43 ` Nate Watterson
2017-03-31 12:40 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-03-31 13:13 ` Robin Murphy
2017-03-31 14:33 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331124051.GI8967@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).