From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:33:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] IOVA allocation improvements for iommu-dma
In-Reply-To: <10f9621a-41ca-bb3d-0e49-a2827022f608@arm.com>
References: <cover.1489581865.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
 <20170331124051.GI8967@arm.com>
 <10f9621a-41ca-bb3d-0e49-a2827022f608@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20170331143329.GQ7266@8bytes.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:13:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> I was assuming this would go through the IOMMU tree if there were no
> problems and the feedback was good, and that would seem to be the case.
> I'm pleasantly surprised that this series doesn't even conflict at all
> with my other iommu-dma changes already queued - I've just checked that
> it still applies cleanly to the current iommu/next as-is.

Yes, makes sense. Can you please resend it with the review and
tested-tags added? I queue it then.


Thanks,

	Joerg