From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Add driver for A83T CCU
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 09:53:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403075353.ep4yoadxjpw5c5vf@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v647bc0VdYTQDyEjAerKnfjtkDYGdhnUgpTU-Tuns6FYYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:53:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> To me it seems the "factors" bits are mostly the same. Differences
> >> are mostly with parent-specific pre-dividers, clock post-dividers,
> >> and non-standard factors. The first is nicely handled by the new mux
> >> wrapper, the second is currently only used with NK types, and the
> >> last is currently only supported by single factor divider or
> >> multiplier clocks with tables.
> >>
> >> Non-standard factors are probably the trickiest one, but given we will
> >> support full factor tables for some of the tricky CPU PLLs, this is
> >> probably solved, even if not implemented yet.
> >>
> >> I'll start with the NP style clocks, which only use P when the output
> >> is under a certain frequency.
> >
> > Do we need to use a P factor? I mean, we can just create a custom
> > clock for that, I'd realy don't want to cripple the generic code for a
> > completely non-generic problem.
>
> I'm not sure. AFAIK the vendor BSP cpufreq doesn't use frequencies
> low enough to require the P divider, so we could just ignore it. But
> then we need to make sure it's set to 1 at probe time, while keeping
> the output frequency usable, which would kind of bloat the probe
> function. FYI I'm in favor of doing it this way.
Hmmm, I don't know why I replied that anymore, I thought you were
still talking about MMC, while you were clearly talking about
CPU_PLLs...
The question still remains though. If we're not using P yet, and if
the BSP doesn't either, then we can just hardcode it.
We can always come up with something later if we need to use it,
either an NP-class, or a table. The only thing we need to care about
would be to pay attention to what the P factor already is, before
forcing it to 1. If it's set to 4, that would mean multiplying the CPU
clock by 4, which is probably not such a great idea.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170403/59f79643/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-14 3:35 [PATCH 0/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Add support for A83T CCU Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-14 3:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] clk: sunxi-ng: mp: Adjust parent rate for pre-dividers Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-14 9:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-02-14 3:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] clk: sunxi-ng: gate: Support common pre-dividers Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-14 9:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-02-14 3:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Add compatible string for A83T CCU to bindings Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-14 3:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Add driver for A83T CCU Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-14 9:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-02-14 10:26 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-15 9:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-03-01 19:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-03-03 9:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-03-03 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-03-07 14:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-03-22 6:50 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-03-26 20:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-03-27 8:53 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-04-03 7:53 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2017-02-14 3:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: sun8i-a83t: Add CCU device nodes Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403075353.ep4yoadxjpw5c5vf@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox