From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Allwinner clock fixes for 4.11, bis
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:10:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406231003.GS7065@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406074121.tkivdvghbr27tr54@lukather>
On 04/06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Mike, Stephen,
>
> Please pull the following changes for one of the 4.11-rc's
>
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>
> The following changes since commit b467e08a15563dede0d37d3233baa24fb97a7310:
>
> clk: sunxi-ng: fix recalc_rate formula of NKMP clocks (2017-03-20 10:34:05 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git tags/sunxi-clk-fixes-for-4.11-2
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d054a839a0986136374d49f9f9fbc264abae9c4c:
>
> clk: sunxi-ng: fix build error without CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER (2017-03-27 13:37:05 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Allwinner clock fixes for 4.11, bis
>
> A few patches to fix a build error and a few minor typos and bugs in the
> sunxi-ng code
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Chen-Yu Tsai (3):
> clk: sunxi-ng: use 1 as fallback for minimum multiplier
> clk: sunxi-ng: Fix round_rate/set_rate multiplier minimum mismatch
> clk: sunxi-ng: a80: Fix audio PLL comment not matching actual code
>
> Tobias Regnery (1):
> clk: sunxi-ng: fix build error without CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER
>
Two of these are fixes for regressions in v4.10? Why are these
critical for the v4.11 release? The comment patch is totally
bogus, it's not fixing any sort of regression that is causing
problems for people so I'm not sure why it was put into this pull
request. Am I right in assuming that the only real patch we need
out of here is the last one for the build error from randconfigs?
If so I can cherry-pick that from the branch into fixes and the
rest can go the next merge window.
Not pulling for now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-06 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-06 7:41 [GIT PULL] Allwinner clock fixes for 4.11, bis Maxime Ripard
2017-04-06 23:10 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2017-04-10 8:00 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-04-10 18:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-04-19 16:06 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170406231003.GS7065@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).