linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: ftrace: don't validate branch via PLT in ftrace_make_nop()
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:13:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170410141343.1045-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170410141343.1045-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

When turning branch instructions into NOPs, we attempt to validate the
action by comparing the old value at the call site with the opcode of
a direct relative branch instruction pointing at the old target.

However, these call sites are statically initialized to call _mcount(),
and may be redirected via a PLT entry if the module is loaded far away
from the kernel text, leading to false negatives and spurious errors.

So skip the validation if in this case if CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS is
configured.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
index 40ad08ac569a..a8db6857cad6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -84,12 +84,15 @@ int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
 		    unsigned long addr)
 {
 	unsigned long pc = rec->ip;
-	u32 old, new;
+	u32 old = 0, new;
 
-	old = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm(pc, addr, AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_LINK);
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS))
+		old = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm(pc, addr,
+						  AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_LINK);
 	new = aarch64_insn_gen_nop();
 
-	return ftrace_modify_code(pc, old, new, true);
+	return ftrace_modify_code(pc, old, new,
+				  !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS));
 }
 
 void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command)
-- 
2.9.3

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-10 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-10 14:13 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: ftrace: fix interop issues with module PLTs Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 14:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-04-10 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: ftrace: add support for far branches to dynamic ftrace Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 14:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 14:39     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 14:40       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170410141343.1045-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).