From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:43:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm: spear6xx: DT cleanups and improvements
In-Reply-To: <20170417091016.1f0732a9@free-electrons.com>
References: <1490093512-32665-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <20170321105943.GT25659@vireshk-i7>
 <20170414224715.4493109a@free-electrons.com>
 <20170417040655.GA28191@vireshk-i7>
 <20170417091016.1f0732a9@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <20170417071322.GK28191@vireshk-i7>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 17-04-17, 09:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:36:55 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > Yes, that would be the normal flow and I did that initially. But then the number
> > of patches really decreased and its better to send the patches directly to ARM
> > maintainers so that they can apply them. No need of PULL requests really.
> > 
> > Send them to: arm-soc <arm@kernel.org>
> 
> OK, thanks. I more recently sent two other SPEAr600 patches, one adding
> the ADC to the DT, one fixing the clock driver for the ADC clock.
> 
> Could you have a look at them, and hopefully give your Acked-by, so
> that I can get send them to arm-soc at the same time?

Already done this morning.

-- 
viresh