From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:10:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm: spear6xx: DT cleanups and improvements In-Reply-To: <20170417040655.GA28191@vireshk-i7> References: <1490093512-32665-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20170321105943.GT25659@vireshk-i7> <20170414224715.4493109a@free-electrons.com> <20170417040655.GA28191@vireshk-i7> Message-ID: <20170417091016.1f0732a9@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:36:55 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Yes, that would be the normal flow and I did that initially. But then the number > of patches really decreased and its better to send the patches directly to ARM > maintainers so that they can apply them. No need of PULL requests really. > > Send them to: arm-soc OK, thanks. I more recently sent two other SPEAr600 patches, one adding the ADC to the DT, one fixing the clock driver for the ADC clock. Could you have a look at them, and hopefully give your Acked-by, so that I can get send them to arm-soc at the same time? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com