From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:25:03 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Fix power-of-ten vs. power-of-two prefixes in comments etc. In-Reply-To: <20170418141312.GD27592@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1491207492.6020.8.camel@infradead.org> <20170404054144.GG16309@linaro.org> <20170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org> <1491291844.6218.25.camel@infradead.org> <20170404092604.GB14898@arm.com> <1492085938.20068.6.camel@infradead.org> <20170416231223.GA31693@verge.net.au> <20170418141312.GD27592@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20170419142503.GC12105@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:13:12PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 01:18:58PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > >> Less important than in user-visible messages, but still good practice as > > >> there's still no excuse for ARM64 code to look like it was written before > > >> 1996. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > I'd be happy to take the Renesas portions of this change if they were > > > broken out into a separate patch. The reason I would prefer a separate > > > patch is to avoid the possibility of conflicts, even trivial ones. > > > > s/possibility/reality/, unless this series goes in before v4.12-rc1. > > Maybe the arm-soc guys can take both patches on top of the other series > they pull, in which case, for both patches: > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Sure, please resend to arm at kernel.org with collected acks. -Olo