linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf evsel: Fix to perf-stat malloc corruption on arm64 platforms
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:52:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170427155221.GB6646@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFpQJXWjx3uVG-6UNiJzmdc4FFw8kea2A5aJZquxVRXq8BR1VQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:16:41PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> > Could you please give my diff a go?
> 
> i tried your diff, and testing looks ok.

Can I take that as a Tested-by when I post this as a proper patch?

> below is the cleanly merged diff on top of latest commit
> f832460 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc

Thanks for the rebase.

Mark.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 13b5499..4be2980 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,28 @@ static void read_counters(void)
>   }
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * Close all evnt FDs we open in __run_perf_stat() and
> + * create_perf_stat_counter(), taking care to match the number of
> threads and CPUs.
> + *
> + * Note that perf_evlist__close(evsel_list) is not equivalent, as it doesn't
> + * take the target into account.
> + */
> +static void close_counters(void)
> +{
> +       bool per_cpu = target__has_cpu(&target);
> +       struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> +
> +       evlist__for_each_entry(evsel_list, evsel) {
> +               if (per_cpu)
> +                       perf_evsel__close_per_cpu(evsel,
> +                                                 perf_evsel__cpus(evsel));
> +               else
> +                       perf_evsel__close_per_thread(evsel,
> +                                                    evsel_list->threads);
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  static void process_interval(void)
>  {
>   struct timespec ts, rs;
> @@ -686,7 +708,7 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
>   * group leaders.
>   */
>   read_counters();
> - perf_evlist__close(evsel_list);
> + close_counters();
> 
>   return WEXITSTATUS(status);
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index ac59710..ecd9778 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1691,6 +1691,20 @@ int perf_evsel__open_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>   return perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, threads);
>  }
> 
> +void perf_evsel__close_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                              struct cpu_map *cpus)
> + {
> +       int ncpus = cpus ? cpus->nr : 1;
> +       perf_evsel__close(evsel, ncpus, 1);
> + }
> +
> +void perf_evsel__close_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                                 struct thread_map *threads)
> + {
> +       int nthreads = threads ? threads->nr : 1;
> +       perf_evsel__close(evsel, 1, nthreads);
> + }
> +
>  static int perf_evsel__parse_id_sample(const struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>         const union perf_event *event,
>         struct perf_sample *sample)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 06ef6f2..6779bd2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -250,6 +250,10 @@ int perf_evsel__open_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>       struct cpu_map *cpus);
>  int perf_evsel__open_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>   struct thread_map *threads);
> +void perf_evsel__close_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                              struct cpu_map *cpus);
> +void perf_evsel__close_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                                 struct thread_map *threads);
>  int perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
>       struct thread_map *threads);
>  void perf_evsel__close(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads);

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-27 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-26  9:26 [PATCH] perf evsel: Fix to perf-stat malloc corruption on arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-26 14:50 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-26 17:12   ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-26 18:19     ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-27 14:34       ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-27 15:46         ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-27 15:52           ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-04-27 17:24             ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170427155221.GB6646@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).