From: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org (Mathieu Poirier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] coresight: use const for device_node structures
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:21:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170503202136.GA7860@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493712903-16726-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Hi Leo,
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:03PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Almost low level functions from open firmware have used const to
> qualify device_node structures, so add const for device_node
> parameters in of_coresight related functions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/coresight.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> index 629e031..859ad49 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
> endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
> }
>
> -static void of_coresight_get_ports(struct device_node *node,
> +static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
> int *nr_inport, int *nr_outport)
> {
> struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node)
The original code didn't do things right. I suggest:
struct coresight_platform_data *
of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct device *dev,
const struct device_node *node)
> {
> int i = 0, ret = 0, cpu;
> struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
> index 2a5982c..769f2c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
> @@ -264,10 +264,10 @@ static inline int coresight_timeout(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> extern struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node);
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node);
Same as above.
Please send me another revision and I'll pick this up for the next cycle.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> #else
> static inline struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 8:15 [PATCH] coresight: use const for device_node structures Leo Yan
2017-05-03 20:21 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2017-05-04 0:40 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170503202136.GA7860@linaro.org \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).