From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 11:21:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add arm@kernel.org as the list for arm64 defconfig changes In-Reply-To: <0ad7d305-d323-339f-9534-d559f1cf656a@codeaurora.org> References: <1493829085-11864-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <20170503170110.GB23620@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <95597ce9-a46f-1491-ae65-518ed8b8c44c@codeaurora.org> <4b048ba1-b7e4-6ab6-95be-3163120f63aa@codeaurora.org> <0ad7d305-d323-339f-9534-d559f1cf656a@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20170504102114.GC5417@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 05/03/2017 12:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > No, I'm not saying that, and there is a better way: Send it through > > Andy if in doubt -- it should be his job as your platform maintainer > > to help guide you through the system if needed. > > Will told me that defconfig patches should go to arm at kernel.org, but you're > telling me they should go to Andy instead. defconfig patches go via arm at kernel.org, because they pick them up from the platform maintainers. However, given that the merge window is open (and my understanding is that you want these in for 4.12!), I suggested mailing them directly to arm at kernel.org to get their opinion, which they promptly provided ;) Apologies for the confusion, Will