From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 0/2] arm64: fix hotplug rwsem boot fallout
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:54:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170511125430.GD14766@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705111200400.1758@nanos>
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:30:39AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 May 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > secondary_start_kernel()
> > > check_local_cpu_capabilities()
> > > update_cpu_errata_workarounds()
> > > update_cpu_capabilities()
> > > static_key_enable()
> > > __static_key_slow_inc()
> > > jump_label_lock()
> > > mutex_lock(&jump_label_mutex);
> > >
> > > How is that supposed to work?
> > >
> > > That call path is the low level CPU bringup, running in the context of the
> > > idle task of that CPU with interrupts and preemption disabled. Taking a
> > > mutex in that context, even if in that case the mutex is uncontended, is a
> > > NONO.
> > As an aside, do we have anything that should detect the broken mutex
> > usage? I've been testing kernels with LOCKDEP, PROVE_LOCKING,
> > DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, and friends, and nothing has complained so far.
>
> Peter and myself were wondering about that already. No idea why that
> doesn't yell at you.
AFAICT, this happens early enough that system_state is SYSTEM_BOOTING.
In ___might_sleep(), we see this and bail out without a splat.
Thanks,
Mark.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-28 11:01 [PATCHv3 0/2] arm64: fix hotplug rwsem boot fallout Mark Rutland
2017-04-28 11:01 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] jump_label: Provide static_key_[enable|/slow_inc]_cpuslocked() Mark Rutland
2017-04-28 11:01 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked() Mark Rutland
2017-05-10 18:10 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] arm64: fix hotplug rwsem boot fallout Mark Rutland
2017-05-10 20:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-11 8:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-11 9:37 ` Mark Rutland
2017-05-11 10:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-11 12:54 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170511125430.GD14766@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox