From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: Add dump_backtrace() in show_regs
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 11:09:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524100949.GA24574@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494294817-29187-2-git-send-email-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Hi,
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:53:37AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Generic code expects show_regs() to dump the stack, but arm64's
> show_regs() does not. This makes it hard to debug softlockups and
> other issues that result in show_regs() being called.
>
> This patch updates arm64's show_regs() to dump the stack, as common
> code expects.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> index 801a16db..5b6eafc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> @@ -30,5 +30,6 @@ struct stackframe {
> extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame);
> extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
> int (*fn)(struct stackframe *, void *), void *data);
> +extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk);
>
> #endif /* __ASM_STACKTRACE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index ae2a835..af1ea25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
> {
> __show_regs(regs);
> + dump_backtrace(regs, NULL);
> }
>
> static void tls_thread_flush(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index d4d6ae0..368c3c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
> }
>
> -static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> struct stackframe frame;
> unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
I just realised that we'll need one additional fixup:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 0805b44..f452fcc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -728,8 +728,6 @@ static int bug_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
break;
case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN:
- /* Ideally, report_bug() should backtrace for us... but no. */
- dump_backtrace(regs, NULL);
break;
default:
... since report_bug() will call show_regs(), and dump the stack itself
now.
With that change, these patches will also fix *_ONCE() traps spewing
backtraces every time they're invoked, which was a side-effect of
commit:
19d436268dde9538 ("debug: Add _ONCE() logic to report_bug()")
Would you mind folding that into a v3?
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-24 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-08 13:56 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Call __show_regs directly Kefeng Wang
2017-05-08 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Add dump_backtrace() in show_regs Kefeng Wang
2017-05-08 15:04 ` Mark Rutland
2017-05-09 1:23 ` Kefeng Wang
2017-05-08 14:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Call __show_regs directly Mark Rutland
2017-05-09 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Kefeng Wang
2017-05-09 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: Add dump_backtrace() in show_regs Kefeng Wang
2017-05-24 10:09 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-05-25 10:58 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170524100949.GA24574@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).