From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (Antoine Tenart) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:51:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 12/12] ARM: sun5i: add a cryptographic engine node In-Reply-To: <20170530064811.idsv66mvfyh2tyiw@flea.lan> References: <20170529202738.2167-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <20170529202738.2167-13-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <20170530064811.idsv66mvfyh2tyiw@flea.lan> Message-ID: <20170530065147.GB5802@kwain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Maxime, On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:27:38PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > Add a node for the cryptographic engine that can be found on sun5i SoCs. > > This cryptographic engine is compatible with the Allwinner cryptographic > > accelerator driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi > > index 5175f9cc9bed..9bfefa2c7224 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi > > @@ -355,6 +355,14 @@ > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > > > + crypto: crypto-engine at 01c15000 { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto"; > > you should add a SoC-specific compatible here, just so that if we ever > need to fix something in there we don't have to update our DT. Sure. I'll also make patches for the other sunXi crypto nodes as they do no have SoC-specific compatibles either. Thanks, Antoine -- Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: