[PATCH] arm64: fault: Print info about page table structure when dumping pte

[will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)]

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:16:39PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:10:47AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Whilst debugging a remote crash, I noticed that show_pte is unhelpful
> > when it comes to describing the structure of the page table being walked.
> > This is easily fixed by printing out the page table (swapper vs user),
> > page size and virtual address size when displaying the PGD address.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> > index 37b95dff0b07..ee6085a922b6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> > @@ -89,7 +89,9 @@ void show_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> >  	if (!mm)
> >  		mm = &init_mm;
> >  
> > -	pr_alert("pgd = %p\n", mm->pgd);
> > +	pr_alert("%s pgtable: %luk pages, %u-bit VAs, pgd = %p\n",
> > +		 mm == &init_mm ? "swapper" : "user", PAGE_SIZE / SZ_1K,
> > +		 VA_BITS, mm->pgd);
> 
> I take it this will go with Kristina's fix [1] to dump the correct page
> table?

Yup, just waiting for her to respin those patches and I'll apply this one on
top.

> Otherwise, this would be more misleading than presently.
> 
> Assuming that is the case, this looks very useful to me. FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,

Will