From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: avoid KASAN stack overflows
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:18:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607161816.GA8330@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07c30069-84f5-be51-85ab-c3c84eea9463@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 07:12:30PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 06:35 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > I recently tried building the kernel with a GCC 7.1.0 toolchain, and
> > encountered a number of new and surprising failures on kernels buitl with
> > KASAN.
> >
> > It looks like this is due to stack instrumentation, which my prior toolchain
> > didn't support. KASAN's stack instrumentation significantly bloats the stack
> > significantly, leading to stack overflows and subsequent failures as a result
> > of the data corruption they cause.
>
> This is caused by -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope which is added in gcc 7.
> Arnd reported that sometimes it causes enormously huge stack growth.
Ah. Sorry for the bogus attribution, then.
> Given that we haven't found any single use-after-scope bug so far, I wouldn't object
> removing it completely.
FWIW, I saw a single use-after-scope splat when testing with syzkaller
(prior to these patches), but that may have been a result of things
going wrong after a stack overflow. Unfortuantely I threw away all of
the results of that run.
I'll see if anything triggers overnight with this patch.
Otherwise, I'm also happy for use-after-scope checks to be disabled.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 15:35 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: avoid KASAN stack overflows Mark Rutland
2017-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid open-coding THREAD_SIZE{,_ORDER} Mark Rutland
2017-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: use larger stacks for KASAN Mark Rutland
2017-06-07 16:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: avoid KASAN stack overflows Andrey Ryabinin
2017-06-07 16:18 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-06-07 19:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607161816.GA8330@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).