From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 6/9] drivers: perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:42:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614104230.GC6085@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170614100658.GE16190@arm.com>
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:06:58AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Apologies, I misunderstood your algorithm (I thought step (a) was on one CPU
> and step (b) was on another). Still, I don't understand the need for the
> timeout. If you instead read back the flag immediately, wouldn't it still
> work? e.g.
>
>
> lock:
> Readl_relaxed flag
> if (locked)
> goto lock;
>
> Writel_relaxed unique ID to flag
> Readl flag
> if (locked by somebody else)
> goto lock;
>
> <critical section>
>
> unlock:
> Writel unlocked value to flag
>
>
> Given that we're dealing with iomem, I think it will work, but I could be
> missing something obvious.
Don't we have the race below where both threads can enter the critical
section?
// flag f initial zero (unlocked)
// t1, flag 1 // t2, flag 2
readl(f); // reads 0 l = readl(f); // reads 0
<thinks lock is free> <thinks lock is free>
writel(1, f);
readl(f); // reads 1
<thinks lock owned>
writel(2, f);
readl(f) // reads 2
<thinks lock owned>
<crticial section> <critical section>
Thanks,
Mark.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-14 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-22 12:48 [PATCH v8 6/9] drivers: perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver Shaokun Zhang
2017-06-08 16:35 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-09 14:18 ` John Garry
2017-06-09 14:30 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-09 15:10 ` John Garry
2017-06-14 10:06 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-14 10:42 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-06-14 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-14 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-14 11:35 ` John Garry
2017-06-14 11:40 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-14 11:59 ` John Garry
2017-06-14 10:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-14 11:06 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-09 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-09 16:09 ` John Garry
2017-06-09 16:45 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-14 8:11 ` Zhangshaokun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170614104230.GC6085@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).