From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:33:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 12/16] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: Add support to set IODELAY values In-Reply-To: <3149f88d-c33f-0d3e-aabe-ac6f840bb41c@ti.com> References: <20170616124544.15046-1-kishon@ti.com> <20170616124544.15046-13-kishon@ti.com> <20170619060256.GK3730@atomide.com> <810fba3e-a488-fa0d-5639-47f1c76ea2b6@ti.com> <20170619072523.GL3730@atomide.com> <3149f88d-c33f-0d3e-aabe-ac6f840bb41c@ti.com> Message-ID: <20170619143338.GN3730@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [170619 00:55]: > Hi Tony, > > On Monday 19 June 2017 12:55 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [170618 23:37]: > >> Hi Tony, > >> > >> On Monday 19 June 2017 11:32 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [170616 05:47]: > >>>> The data manual of J6/J6 Eco recommends to set different IODELAY values > >>>> depending on the mode in which the MMC/SD is enumerated in order to > >>>> ensure IO timings are met. > >>>> > >>>> Add support to set the IODELAY values depending on the various MMC > >>>> modes using the pinctrl APIs. > >>> > >>> This does not seem to apply against Linux next for me for > >>> the binding. Fixing that, compile fails for me with: > >>> > >>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c:2384:13: error: > >>> 'struct omap_hsmmc_platform_data' has no member named 'version' > >> > >> This series has a dependency with > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg586215.html series > >> > >> *version* member is added in patch with $subject > >> "ARM: OMAP2+: Add pdata-quirks for MMC/SD on DRA74x EVM" > > > > Ah sorry I keep forgetting that. Looks like the only thing > > pending with that series is that you were going to send > > an update for omap3-overo-base. > > I've sent that as a separate patch [1]. But I can resend the entire series if > that's what you'd prefer. Oh sorry I had already untagged that thread, I probably did not notice your updated patch. It's best to resend that series right after -rc1 so we get it to Linux next for few weeks of testing. Right now there's a dependency to the related MMC patches, and patch 8/8 conflicts with the unused regulator removal patch. Regards, Tony > [1] -> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg180747.html