* [PATCH v2] drivers/kmem: disable on arm64
@ 2017-06-19 14:37 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-19 15:03 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2017-06-19 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On arm64, the /dev/kmem driver barely works, given that it assumes that
VMALLOC_START > PAGE_OFFSET, which is not the case on arm64. Due to the
dubious value of kmem on an architecture such as arm64, which is fairly
new and is not as forgiving as other architectures when it comes to
userland accesses to kernel memory using mismatched attributes*, let's
disable it altogether if CONFIG_ARM64=y.
* Mappings in the vmalloc region will be accessed using vread/vwrite when
reading/writing to/from /dev/kmem, which will perform these accesses by
kmap()'ing each page using writeback cacheable attributes. This will be
correct in most cases, but this is not guaranteed.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
drivers/char/Kconfig | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig
index 31adbebf812e..8102ee7b3247 100644
--- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ config DEVMEM
config DEVKMEM
bool "/dev/kmem virtual device support"
+ # On arm64, VMALLOC_START < PAGE_OFFSET, which confuses kmem read/write
+ depends on !ARM64
help
Say Y here if you want to support the /dev/kmem device. The
/dev/kmem device is rarely used, but can be used for certain
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drivers/kmem: disable on arm64
2017-06-19 14:37 [PATCH v2] drivers/kmem: disable on arm64 Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2017-06-19 15:03 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-20 6:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2017-06-19 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On arm64, the /dev/kmem driver barely works, given that it assumes that
> VMALLOC_START > PAGE_OFFSET, which is not the case on arm64. Due to the
Probably worth being explicit about the failure mode here (the commit
message you had in your RFC was much better ;).
Will
> dubious value of kmem on an architecture such as arm64, which is fairly
> new and is not as forgiving as other architectures when it comes to
> userland accesses to kernel memory using mismatched attributes*, let's
> disable it altogether if CONFIG_ARM64=y.
>
> * Mappings in the vmalloc region will be accessed using vread/vwrite when
> reading/writing to/from /dev/kmem, which will perform these accesses by
> kmap()'ing each page using writeback cacheable attributes. This will be
> correct in most cases, but this is not guaranteed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/char/Kconfig | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> index 31adbebf812e..8102ee7b3247 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ config DEVMEM
>
> config DEVKMEM
> bool "/dev/kmem virtual device support"
> + # On arm64, VMALLOC_START < PAGE_OFFSET, which confuses kmem read/write
> + depends on !ARM64
> help
> Say Y here if you want to support the /dev/kmem device. The
> /dev/kmem device is rarely used, but can be used for certain
> --
> 2.7.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drivers/kmem: disable on arm64
2017-06-19 15:03 ` Will Deacon
@ 2017-06-20 6:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2017-06-20 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 19 June 2017 at 17:03, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On arm64, the /dev/kmem driver barely works, given that it assumes that
>> VMALLOC_START > PAGE_OFFSET, which is not the case on arm64. Due to the
>
> Probably worth being explicit about the failure mode here (the commit
> message you had in your RFC was much better ;).
>
Yeah, that's a fair point, I was being lazy :-)
I will repost with the v1 commit log integrated
>> dubious value of kmem on an architecture such as arm64, which is fairly
>> new and is not as forgiving as other architectures when it comes to
>> userland accesses to kernel memory using mismatched attributes*, let's
>> disable it altogether if CONFIG_ARM64=y.
>>
>> * Mappings in the vmalloc region will be accessed using vread/vwrite when
>> reading/writing to/from /dev/kmem, which will perform these accesses by
>> kmap()'ing each page using writeback cacheable attributes. This will be
>> correct in most cases, but this is not guaranteed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/Kconfig | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> index 31adbebf812e..8102ee7b3247 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ config DEVMEM
>>
>> config DEVKMEM
>> bool "/dev/kmem virtual device support"
>> + # On arm64, VMALLOC_START < PAGE_OFFSET, which confuses kmem read/write
>> + depends on !ARM64
>> help
>> Say Y here if you want to support the /dev/kmem device. The
>> /dev/kmem device is rarely used, but can be used for certain
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-20 6:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-19 14:37 [PATCH v2] drivers/kmem: disable on arm64 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-19 15:03 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-20 6:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).