* [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: Fix possible recursive locking for arch_hw_breakpoint_init
@ 2017-06-16 8:22 Tony Lindgren
2017-06-16 15:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 15:17 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2017-06-16 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Recent change to use cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked() with commit
fe2a5cd8aa03 ("ARM/hw_breakpoint: Use cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()")
missed to change the related paired cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked().
Now if arch_hw_breakpoint_init() fails, we get "WARNING: possible recursive
locking detected" on the exit path.
Fixes: fe2a5cd8aa03 ("ARM/hw_breakpoint: Use
cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()")
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
core_num_brps = 0;
core_num_wrps = 0;
if (ret > 0)
- cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(ret);
+ cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(ret);
cpus_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
--
2.13.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: Fix possible recursive locking for arch_hw_breakpoint_init
2017-06-16 8:22 [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: Fix possible recursive locking for arch_hw_breakpoint_init Tony Lindgren
@ 2017-06-16 15:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 15:17 ` Will Deacon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2017-06-16 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 2017-06-16 01:22:38 [-0700], Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Recent change to use cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked() with commit
> fe2a5cd8aa03 ("ARM/hw_breakpoint: Use cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()")
> missed to change the related paired cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked().
>
> Now if arch_hw_breakpoint_init() fails, we get "WARNING: possible recursive
> locking detected" on the exit path.
>
> Fixes: fe2a5cd8aa03 ("ARM/hw_breakpoint: Use
> cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()")
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Thank you.
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: Fix possible recursive locking for arch_hw_breakpoint_init
2017-06-16 8:22 [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: Fix possible recursive locking for arch_hw_breakpoint_init Tony Lindgren
2017-06-16 15:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2017-06-19 15:17 ` Will Deacon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2017-06-19 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:22:38AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Recent change to use cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked() with commit
> fe2a5cd8aa03 ("ARM/hw_breakpoint: Use cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()")
> missed to change the related paired cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked().
>
> Now if arch_hw_breakpoint_init() fails, we get "WARNING: possible recursive
> locking detected" on the exit path.
>
> Fixes: fe2a5cd8aa03 ("ARM/hw_breakpoint: Use
> cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()")
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This looks correct to me, so I guess it should go via -tip (where the
problematic patch is queued already).
Will
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
> core_num_brps = 0;
> core_num_wrps = 0;
> if (ret > 0)
> - cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(ret);
> + cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(ret);
> cpus_read_unlock();
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.13.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-19 15:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-16 8:22 [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: Fix possible recursive locking for arch_hw_breakpoint_init Tony Lindgren
2017-06-16 15:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 15:17 ` Will Deacon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).