From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: pass machine size to sparse
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:12:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170621161254.GF6041@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170620190739.ijtpo3ekibxi47qj@ltop.local>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:07:40PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:04:01PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:49:39PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > Looks fine to me, but just wondering whether or not we should also be
> > > > passing something to indicate the endianness of the target. Does sparse care
> > > > about that?
> > >
> > > Yes, we should. sparse doesn't care per-se but some macros, structures
> > > or whole portion of code may depends on '__{LITTLE,BIG}_ENDIAN__'
> > > being defined or not, for example (but I don't think it will make
> > > a big difference, at least nothing like the 629904 'constant is so big'
> > > warnings we have now due to the missing -m64).
> > >
> > > For this, you have two possibilities:
> > > 1) just doing something like PPC:
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > > +CHECKFLAGS += -D__BIG_ENDIAN__
> > > +else
> > > +CHECKFLAGS += -D__LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> > > +endif
> > > This will work now. I can't send you a proper patch if you wish.
> > >
> > > 2) a cleaner solution, IMO, would be to teach sparse about
> > > -mlittle-endian/-mbig-endian. In fact I already wrote the patch
> > > earlier today. But of course, you will need to wait for the patch
> > > to reach sparse's master and then compile sparse yourself or wait
> > > for a new release (which shouldn't take much long, though).
> >
> > If you do that, you could also teach it that AArch64 is 64-bit ;)
>
> Well, currently sparse is arch agnostic and I think it's a good thing.
> For the few arch specifities you have to use some of the '-m' flags
> (like -m32/-m64, -msize-long). So, for the moment the '-m64' flag
> is needed, thus the patch.
Ok, I'll pick your patch up then. The endianness case is more interesting,
because I don't think __BIG_ENDIAN__ and __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ are the defines
to use; the kernel seems to omit the trailing underscores afaict.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 12:24 [PATCH] arm64: pass machine size to sparse Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-20 15:49 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-20 16:24 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-20 17:04 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-20 19:07 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-21 16:12 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-06-21 16:54 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170621161254.GF6041@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).