From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:08:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170621180847.GA24175@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621123535.b5fvwlydfhnhuqll@piout.net>
Hi!
> > > Or not, having an RTC set in the past is actually quite common. I'd find
> > > it weird to have a new device boot and be set to a date in the future.
> >
> > ...but still better than board stuck in the past, no?
> >
> > > Also note that the threshold or offset thing may seem like a good idea
> > > but fails with many RTCs because of how they handle leap years.
> >
> > Well, you can still convert time from rtc to unix time, then do adjustment
> > there.
> >
>
> You can only if your machine is running when that happens. If that is
> not the case, then you lost and your time is not correct anymore.
I don't see why that should be a case... as long as you know what RTC
does in event of overflow, and it is not something completely crazy.
> > Anyway, I guess it would be cool for rtc drivers to annotate what limits
> > underlying storage has to the common code, so that we can do fixups once
> > per class, not once per driver.
>
> Yes, I'm in the middle of the whole rework that allows that.
>
> I don't understand the sudden urgency of fixing that and the amount of
> bikeshedding, seeing that the closest cutoff date is actually 31st of
> december 2069 in the rtc subsystem and that anyway the current 32bit
> userspace will explode in february 2038.
>
> My plan from the beginning was to have something for the next stable. I
> know nobody can read my mind but again, I don't think there is currently
> any urgency to change anything.
Yes, mind reading is a problem. I can only read minds of ferungulates,
and only if they are physicaly near me :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170621/cd332894/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq@piout.net>
2017-06-20 22:00 ` [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-20 22:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21 7:51 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 8:39 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21 6:34 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 12:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21 18:08 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-06-21 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21 9:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 9:35 Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20 10:03 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:07 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 12:10 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 12:24 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 13:26 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:37 ` Steve Twiss
2017-06-20 13:44 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 15:07 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20 21:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21 9:26 ` David Laight
2017-06-21 9:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 22:08 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 9:14 ` Benjamin Gaignard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170621180847.GA24175@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).