From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mchehab@s-opensource.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:35:13 -0300
Subject: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media]
 Patch notification: 3 patches updated
In-Reply-To: <20170622151903.GA14761@amd>
References: <20170622150601.4956.51414@www.linuxtv.org>
 <20170622151903.GA14761@amd>
Message-ID: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Em Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:19:03 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> escreveu:

> Hi!
> 
> 
> > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:
> > 
> >  * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times
> >      - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/
> >      - for: Linux Media kernel patches
> >     was: New
> >     now: Accepted  
> 
> Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And
> that would be really nice to fix.)

Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply 
e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot.

> If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well.

> If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that
> someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his
> tree already.

>>From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one
that did the change...

However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info
about who changed a status (or even to log it)...

Regards,

Thanks,
Mauro