From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:43:06 +0200 Subject: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated In-Reply-To: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan> References: <20170622150601.4956.51414@www.linuxtv.org> <20170622151903.GA14761@amd> <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan> Message-ID: <20170622194306.GA25853@amd> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi! > > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: > > > > > > * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times > > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/ > > > - for: Linux Media kernel patches > > > was: New > > > now: Accepted > > > > Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And > > that would be really nice to fix.) > > Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply > e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot. Well, fortunately he's got human helpers :-). > > If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well. > > > If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that > > someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his > > tree already. > > From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one > that did the change... Aha, thanks for the pointer. > However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info > about who changed a status (or even to log it)... Hopefully, patchwork will get smarter one day... Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: