From: linuc.decode@gmail.com (Linu Cherian)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Support lockless operation
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:38:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627090824.GA2758@virtx40> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170627083912.GA5759@arm.com>
On Tue Jun 27, 2017 at 09:39:13AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:41:55AM +0530, Linu Cherian wrote:
> > On Fri Jun 23, 2017 at 05:04:05PM +0530, Linu Cherian wrote:
> > > On Fri Jun 23, 2017 at 11:35:25AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > Note that on a coherent platform like ThunderX that's as good as just
> > > > deleting it, because you'll never execute the case below. However, on
> > > > reflection I think it can at least safely be downgraded to dma_wmb()
> > > > (i.e. DMB) rather than a full DSB - would you be able to test what
> > > > difference that makes?
> > >
> > > The testing was done on Thunderx 1, which has a non coherent page table walk.
> > > Yes, downgrading to dma_wmb() helps. With this change, performance is back to v1.
> > >
> >
> > Should i send a patch for this ?
>
> I already did it:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/commit/?h=for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates&id=77f3445866c39d8866b31d8d9fa47c7c20938e05
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Thanks Will.
--
Linu cherian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-22 15:53 [PATCH v2 0/8] io-pgtable lock removal Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Check table PTEs more precisely Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Improve split_blk_unmap Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Refactor split_blk_unmap Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] iommu/io-pgtable: Introduce explicit coherency Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Support lockless operation Robin Murphy
2017-06-23 5:53 ` Linu Cherian
2017-06-23 8:56 ` Linu Cherian
2017-06-23 10:35 ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-23 11:34 ` Linu Cherian
2017-06-27 5:11 ` Linu Cherian
2017-06-27 8:39 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-27 9:08 ` Linu Cherian [this message]
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: " Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Remove io-pgtable spinlock Robin Murphy
2017-06-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: " Robin Murphy
2017-06-23 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] io-pgtable lock removal John Garry
2017-06-23 9:58 ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-26 11:35 ` John Garry
2017-06-26 12:31 ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-26 13:12 ` John Garry
2017-06-26 13:19 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170627090824.GA2758@virtx40 \
--to=linuc.decode@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).