From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix endianness annotation for __apply_alternatives()/get_alt_insn()
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:19:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629141944.GD18630@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629141323.GH11040@leverpostej>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:13:23PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:26:47PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > > > get_alt_insn() is used to read and create ARM instructions, which
> > > > are always stored in memory in little-endian order. These values
> > > > are thus correctly converted to/from native order when processed
> > > > but the pointers used to hold the address of these instructions
> > > > are declared as for native order values.
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by declaring the pointers as __le32* instead of u32* and
> > > > make the few appropriate needed changes.
> > > >
> > > > + origptr = (__le32 __force *) ALT_ORIG_PTR(alt);
> > > > + replptr = (__le32 __force *) ALT_REPL_PTR(alt);
> > >
> > > Why is the __force needed here?
> >
> > Because of the cast to u32* in:
> > #define ALT_ORIG_PTR(a) __ALT_PTR(a, orig_offset)
> > #define ALT_REPL_PTR(a) __ALT_PTR(a, alt_offset)
> > #define __ALT_PTR(a,f) (u32 *)((void *)&(a)->f + (a)->f)
> >
> > Of course, if this (u32*) is not really needed, then the __force
> > is also not needed.
> >
> > And since, it seems indeed to be the case, I'll gladly sent a patch:
> > -#define __ALT_PTR(a,f) (u32 *)((void *)&(a)->f + (a)->f)
> > +#define __ALT_PTR(a,f) ((void *)&(a)->f + (a)->f)
> > if it suits you.
>
> Given __ALT_PTR is intended to give a pointer to A64 instructions, which
> are in le32 format, wouldn't it make more sense for __ALT_PTR to cast to
> __le32 * ?
Might be a bit weird for ALT_REPL_PTR, which is cast to unsigned long.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-29 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 14:55 [PATCH] arm64: fix endianness annotation for __apply_alternatives()/get_alt_insn() Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-29 10:28 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-29 13:26 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-29 14:11 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-29 14:13 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-29 14:19 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-06-29 14:22 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-29 14:26 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-29 15:15 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-29 15:20 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-29 15:56 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-06-29 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170629141944.GD18630@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).